The EU debate - Part III
- Thread starter Jürgenmeiʃter
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
- Status
And you didn't?napoleon posts out of desperation to be liked by someone....by anyone!
....and here is #5. Just 2 more needed for the full set.
How sad that all you have is a childish game....and here is #5. Just 2 more needed for the full set.
Oh, you're definitely a shortass!I imagine stumpy would go for the moccasin and nappy the spud the All Star, as that's how he sees himself
You must log in or register to see images
It's either that or you're short in another department.Nobody's this obsessed about something that they're not bothered about.
Oh, you're definitely a shortass!
Nobody's this obsessed about something that they're not bothered about.
100%!Of course you are dear
The fact you look at Saxton's life and consider it a "success" says it all
Did the behemoth get you a new suit to impress your paymaster?
Thank you for participating doc.
Just leave your blanket on the pile with all the others. The snide will be back shortly.
edit: as if by magic......
I suppose some credit is due for admitting itPrefer the males do you?
You'll be **** under questioning when one of them reports you
Prefer the males do you?
Your desperation to label everything as something you perceive to be a negative suggests some textbook inadequacies.
It's bollocks, obviously. Like you're going to get electoral reform from an unelected PM
.Hope this helps.
Anytime,Thank you for participating doc.
Just leave your blanket on the pile with all the others. The snide will be back shortly.
Sadly I have no blanket and and feel no need to boost my ego with pathetic jibes.
But you crack on as it's clearly a form of therapy.
It's the usual suspects:It's bollocks, obviously. Like you're going to get electoral reform from an unelected PM
Hope this helps.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...say-Mrs-threaten-upper-chamber-bloodbath.html
These papers hate Britain and hide behind a mask of patriotism.
I know mate. Priceless isn't he?
Your HMO slum or a terrace in Hull, wow what a choice
The commons also has a pro remain bias. However, I don't think for one minute that they will arbitrarily try to overturn the referendum vote. Nor would I expect The Lords to do so either.
What both can, and should do, is to make sure that May and co don't right roughshod over the constitution in the Brexit process.
What both can, and should do, is to make sure that May and co don't right roughshod over the constitution in the Brexit process.
Last edited:
Girls are never interested in me? I've been married for 30 years. I didn't have to go abroad to find her either.
This from someone who had to smuggle his wife into the country to bail him out financially.That's a head shot right thereGirls are never interested in me? I've been married for 30 years. I didn't have to go abroad to find her either.
Last edited:
It's bollocks, obviously. Like you're going to get electoral reform from an unelected PM
Hope this helps.
You do realise you vote for a party and not the PM
In today's climate of personality and sound bite politics it is now as much about the leader of the party as it is the party policies. Do you think that if May had been leader at the time of the GE that the Tories would have got an overall majority after her disastrous tenure as Home Secretary?
Actually I voted for Catherine West MP. But my point still holds - no one voted for a party led by Theresa May.
- Status