You can pick any excuse you want at any given game and the answer will always be the same......Lack of quality from the chairman to the manager to the coaches to the players. Any two of them you will struggle but to have all of them faults spells relegation.....
Bob would not be my choice but he is here and he inherited a very poor squad of players so he is not to blame.....We were destroyed long before Bob was here.....he is an easy target to blame and i dont buy it one bit....
Why be happy? That's another one of our supposed "rivals" getting away from us....although they seem out of sight now
You've been all over him like a rash for the past few weeks saying how wonderful he was. It won't be long before you're ready to deliver the dagger.
I see... So could I also say Laudrup do the same thing?... Doing a monk by getting himself sacked after signing a new bumper contract. Did it better too cause he got paid even more than monk 4.5m! edited for Libs sake
I was using dai logic about monk on himself. No doubt dai will bang on about him not being good enough whereas monk planned his
think you are taking this too seriously... i was winding dai up just as he cannot possibly think monk deliberately lost games to sack himself, although if he does then it will be interesting how he responds.... all ruined by you now
So, you are unable to back up your statement. Why not just say as much. What has Dai got to do with it ?
Dai claimed in response to my post that Monk wasn't sacked because of poor results but forced the club to sack him and this is proven by his £3m payout. Bobby was merely pointing out that if that was the case Laudrup must have done the same thing as he had an even bigger payout (albeit tongue in cheek).
Nothing to do with whether I'm happy ,or not. It was more a matter of let right be done. There are already enough posters around here who invent scenarios to have a go at former Managers, players etc., to suit their cause. I just felt that you were providing more, unsubstantiated details for them.