Off Topic To be Gay or not to be Gay

So, you are a grubby muslim. Now I understand your hostility towards Stephen Fry.

 

or intelligent to do either so it seems

 

Steady on, I've got an O Level in an ology.

 

You going tomorrow ? if you are I'll test you

 

I'll be there! I should add that my O level is on ornithology, specialising in Great Tits, so if you want a thirty minute discussion before kick off tomorrow I'll be more than happy

 

Where do I want to go with that? Simple there will be gay footballers . in fact I believe my favourite footballer Ronaldo is gay. BUT as has been discussed his sexuality has **** all to do with it. I dont see the fuss or the need for this "outing" of footballers

Now to your second point. The issue wasn't swept anywhere because a) no one said or accused majority makes of being paedos and b) they aren't. However as I said initially some of the major paedo cases had gay men as the ring leaders but this doesn't seem to get raised

FYI my initial comment on the subject

What I mean is, and it surprises me more isn't made of this, in some of the biggest cases of paedophile rings involving very young children (as young as a few months old) the main perpetrators/ring leaders have been gay men.

 

My point stands and it's nowt do with religion and all to do with the facts.

You do seem to want to focus on religion though. Don't know why?

 

And there you have it

I wasn't always Muslim and my white , atheist family members also think he is a ****wit, as is Dawkins.

As I quoted earlier they are what stupid people see as intelligent people.

 

Actually, I can see who is the **** wit, and where it comes from.

 

First step is admitting it

 

Paedophilia of any kind is to be deplored, be it by gay or heterosexuals, so I'm not sure why you try to differentiate between the two.

 

Who was differentiating it?

I posted you my direct initial quote and you can see what it was in response to

Let me ask you this, if all major child abuse rings that have recently been busted had gay men, gay men who ran or were involved with gay charities etc, running them would you not ask the question why this isn't getting the same attention as say Asian men in the north?

I can post my quote again but get the feeling you don't want to discuss that

 

Or is because that most major child abuse rings that have recently been busted DID involve Asian men in the north?

 

Yes they did, don't see any denials

However it must be noted that there is a difference between the Asian men and the gay men. Whereas the Asian men targeted teenage girls the gay men targeted babies

Again though the point is why is this not highlighted or discussed in the same detail as the Asian men?

Surely dirty filthy ****s need exposing regardless of race/sexual orientation?

 

Of course they should. So go ahead - get the FACTS out there

 

The FACTS are as I said in my initial post

What I mean is, and it surprises me more isn't made of this, in some of the biggest cases of paedophile rings involving very young children (as young as a few months old) the main perpetrators/ring leaders have been gay men.

 

And what I am saying is, get the FACTS out there.

Just because you say something it doesn't make it true. Just because you repeat something, doesn't make it true.

Without facts to substantiate your claims, it would appear that your sole agenda is to divert attention from the major child abuse rings that have recently been busted involving Asian men in the north.

It is a fact that all sections of society have a level of paedophilia, so to point the finger at one to divert attention from another is wrong. Currently there seems to be an inordinate level of busts involving Asian men. It needs sorting.

 

I mentioned people like Rennie et al earlier. Seems that no one bothers to read. This guy worked for stonewall and was part of a gang raping 18 month old boys

I think its a hit disengrnious to say I was trying to divert attention from the sick ****s in the northern towns. My point was that all need scrutiny

Judging from some of the responses on here it's srrmss to be all right if its all white

 

Nope, I'd agree with you. ALL paedophiles need scrutiny.

 

Nothing worse than worse than a ginger muslim ,wouldn't you agree and by the way .you can stick your ****ing religion up,your arse , no one ****ing cares