Poll: Should LL be kicked off the forum?

I'd hate to think I was the self appointed spokesman for the forum (and I can think of about 50 people who'd disagree with that assertion), so whilst I can't activate Article 50, I thought I'd open this poll, at Glory's suggestion.

Apologies if I'm self-appointing myself here, Glory. I can always delete & leave it to you. But I know you're sensible. Sometimes

 

Afternoon all. Apart from dating back to his BBC 606 days being a caste iron WUM, what has LL done recently to warrant a vote on this?

 

If Glory loses the referendum, which he will, he will want another vote until he wins

 

Maybe he'll join the EU OLOF. They have a habit of re-running referenda until they get the result they want. Just ask the Danes & the Irish about Maastricht

 

This would be a binding referendum!

 

North west corner. Three bars, loads of legroom

 

TBH I thought LL was someone's second spoof account designed to antagonise. If not then I think he is a first class prick. Still not a fan of banning people. I generally don't respond but that's because I feel like he is just drawing us in on a wind up.

 

You don't know what one is you vote fiddling barsteward.

 

I missed what prompted this

The problem with referenda is people answer different questions to the one posed and make assumptions about what a yes or no vote will entail (ring any bells?)

You might get different answers for

- do you think LL is a tad annoying?
- do you want to lose LL's match highlights posts?
- do you agree LL knows f-all about the effectiveness of our players?
Etc etc

Anyway I voted no, he's not a wum he's a deluded nutter (which makes him fit right in on here)

 

hmmmm ... we all do something stupid on here at some point, but I can see where people are coming from ... the problem with Loverboy is that he's simply ignorant and stubborn, a bit like Trump actually ... his posts have become repetitive bashing of our players, most of it senseless

should Loverboy be banned? no, because being an idiot is pretty much all he's being ... anyway, he seems to welcome the insults not because he's a WUM but because he firmly believes that Chris Wood is useless and Rob Green is terrible ... add to that his "opinion" that Monk should not be a manager and you can understand that he is just a simple bloke who is basically clueless ... he's not being malicious, just thick

my vote is firmly NO, he should stay in the LeedsU


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

Voted not fussed as he means **** all to me.

 

Likewise.

 

Now if you can just stop speaking for the rest of us.... There's a good chap.

 

I only said 'we' once! Honest Guv, it's all documented!

 

Before you speak for we again, even once, seek permission.
BTW it was at least twice across your posts.

 

I was bustin' at the time. Freudian slip, Guv.

 

He's a poor WUM.

I can't usually be arsed feeding his need for attention, but ain't so bothered by his endless bleating that I feel the need to have him on ignore.

Not fussed.

 

Jeez lads, thanks for the compliments, I, ve never ticked the like box so many times in one thread......I love this forum and all the lads on it, fun and banter and all.....love you all........no tongues, see Wj for that....

Davey, with respects, and no malice intended,

I don't seek attention, as you well know, some of you give it too me with your kind insults and complimentary digs because some can't accept another persons opinon, however, truth be known, it's my replies that some can't handle, they get upset, as you know Davy, I don't attack anyone for having an opinion......