De Gea £18m Valencia £16m Bailly £30m Lindelof £31m Shaw £27m Herrera £29m Matic £40m Mkhitaryan £30m Pogba £89m Martial £36m Lukaku £75m TOTAL £419m approx Vs Ederson £30m Walker £50m Stones £48m Otamendi £32m Mendy £53m Fernandinho £35m De Bruyne £55m Sterling £50 Silva £43m Sane £44m Aguero £38m TOTAL £478m approx Vs Courtois £8m Moses £9m Azpi £7m Rudiger £34m Luiz £30m Alonso £23m Bakayoko £40m Kante £32m Hazard £32m Pedro £21m Morata £58m TOTAL £293m Vs Trapp £10m Alves £0m Marquinhos £28m Silva £38m Kurzawa £18m Matuidi £6m Veratti £10m Di Maria £44m Moura £38m Draxler £40m Cavani £55m TOTAL £287m Vs Cech £5m Bellerin £0m Koscielny £10m Mustafi £35m Holding £5m Monreal £10m Xhaka £35m Cazorla £15m Sanchez £32m Ozil £42m Lacazette £53m TOTAL £242m
If the rule is most expensive ahead of best, then it's Batshuayi ahead of Pedro for Chelsea, and Mangala ahead of Kompany for City. If it's best (on form and / or appearances) then Rashford or Lingard ahead of Martial for Utd. Also Trapp was PSG's first choice keeper for most of last season.
It had to be realistic too. Mangala is nowhere near even the bench. Batshuayi more debatable but still he's currently only third choice striker and not a wing forward. Trapp... Edited.
Tons and tons probably. The debate is not whether the spend has been worth anything. The point is who currently has the most expensive realistic first XI.
Otamendi then. Played 80% of league games last season vs only a handful for Kompany when not crocked. Martial is currently third choice for Utd behind Lingard and Rashford, so if you want to be credible with this you need to be consistent with Batshuayi. He played at least half of Chelsea's games last season, probably a similar proportion as Martial played of Utd's given our longer cup runs.
Otamendi, fair enough, adjusted. Batshuayi has started 1 game for Chelsea, rejected. His appearances are cameo sub apps. Martial, started loads for united compared to Batshuayi so he remains for the same reason Otamendi is going in.
And yet you are perfectly happy with Shaw, who only featured in 11 games last season, ahead of Darmian, Rojo and Blind who all played four. Chelsea's third choice striker excluded, Utd's current fourth choice left back included. Hmmm.....
But the aim was to try to make it the most expensive but remaining realistic. Batshuayi at no point will ever be first choice. Shaw would probably be if he was actually fit, wouldn't he? The others are just filling in for him while he recovers aren't they? You think I'm biased towards scummy Chelsea or something?!
I just did simple Google searches and picked the first thing that came up, which ones are wrong? David Silva probably always plays but the aim is to pick the most expensive but realistic XI... So sterling goes in for pure cost as he still plays a lot of games and could be deemed first XI.
Blatantly innit. City have no excuse not to win the league. But united have no excuse not to run away with city at the top. I've got vague memories of Shaw sorting himself out and getting into Mourinho's good books and becoming first choice but then getting injured?
Well if it worked like that United would be pounding the transfer market much harder than this. It doesn't, we have had to pay the prices required to get players to build a squad for the long-term, supplemented with our own academy graduates. We have no excuses though, we should be challenging at the very least. Shaw is a very strange one, has the talent but seems to have lost his way... Big season ahead for him.
Shaw looking like he's let himself go a bit in pre-season for you... please log in to view this image
Matic playing well. This guest commentator on mutv is shocking . I think I actually prefer neutral commentators now, I like to hear criticism