Based on what? Have you any idea at all what is happening at TA re. the playing staff? Or is it more finger in the air stuff to add to the anti-Cellino hysteria?
Glory i can see it you can see it others dont want to see it its says quite clearly and as you rightly say the sale of players is unsustainable The club cannot carry on as things stand FACT
You got the memory of a goldfish? I have nothing to say to you so please don't waste your time by replying to my posts.
I am sure they do. I will respect their wishes if asked but this individual has repeatedly made unproven claims and Indirectly asked for site moderators to ban me. We are not talking a difference of opinions on an LUFC issue its a bit more serious than that..... Not even claiming to be right, just asking to ignored by him so we don't tu the risk of another flame war. Which would quite frankly bore the arse of me, never mind the rest of you!
I'm sure , whomevers right or wrong , there is a thread somewhere this could be discussed on besides "Bolton vs Leeds ....if not , make one . Beating a dead horse on this one
the thread relates to a game that was already played so it's effectively a dad thread and given that I was only replying to an unrequested query you are telling the wrong person.
I couldn't give a ****e what Cellino said. Do you believe I'm some supporter of him or something? I'm merely pointing out your factual inaccuracies (or if you prefer, made up bullshit ) yet again
Post #6 is a direct reply to post #5 that was made by a board moderator where they suggested (accurately btw) that all was not quite as rosey with the accounts as el presidente was briefing to media outlets last week.
So a Leeds poster can't make a one line remark on his board within his total post without setting off the starter pistol on a financial wum fest . And I didn't see your name anywhere in post # 5 of any sort of query .
So a Leeds poster can't reply to a post made by someone he is friendly enough to have met up with? What are you suggesting, one post per thread? I posted the query in reply to the original post.
I don't care what you do frankly , but it would be nice to do it on a thread that doesn't say "Leeds vs Bolton " . Your name wasn't mentioned before post # 5 and by the time the first page was done it was a financial meltdown . Sorry all , just hate seeing any thread ruined that starts with "Team vs Team And gets hijacked . Cheers chippy , me bad ....carry on
At least be even handed with your criticism even if it's just to be fair to all parties in the conversation. There were at least two sides in debate.
The real reason you do not reply is that once again you are fanning the flames of the hysterical anti-Cellino campaign by making totally unsubstantiated claims to meet your own ends. You might even be right, but my information suggests not. I wonder if you would come up with any evidence to support your wild claim if anyone else had to repeat my question? I doubt it, because I don't believe you have anything of substance to present to us. Just wishful thinking or fantasy.
Fantasy. Only in your warped mind did I ask the site moderators to ban you - directly or indirectly. Where is your evidence to support such an accusation. I am getting fed up with these snipes. And let's not go there with the 'unproven claims' - I think that's more in your department. You don't have to go further than this thread to find them.
Mighty you are a bad person. The deputy chief cheerleader is now back on my case and frothing at the mouth. The two days peace were welcome though. Seems to think I give a flying **** about anything he thinks, says or does. He is harder to shake off than a spurned ex wife trying to get a decent alimony pay off.
Are you having reading problems as well now Nigel. Still waiting for you to admit what bit you didn't make up,you got wrong.