Well based on my information of which comes from a very credible source. Unfortunately this is all a load of rubbish. If you needed proof it would be loan signings and selling one of our best players to raise funds for signing.
My only point was that have spent to strengthen the squad isn't balanced by the fee for the player we sold. It may be yet of course. The club may even spend more... A journalist from the bleacher report was on the radio just now saying Hull (sic) had let it be know they will entertain offers in the region of 10m for Snodgrass- I don't know his source.
£14 winnings which took less than a minute to complete, I would say that's a good return. I can go again in a few weeks with the same bet. Our odds will deffo worsen after the next 4. If you can tell me a better way of earning £14 off a £37 investment within 8 days please do tell.
It's the ' different way' Bruce referred to after he had left. It's more commonly referred to as 'ballsing up big style'.
Exactly. So the fact you bet on us to go down should have meant your cash out decreased. Unless you meant you bet on us to stay up?
Just one point to note. I believe Steve Bruce did know the squad was not good enough and we needed to bring new players in to take us to the next level or however you want to phrase it. This is where him and Rehab fell out as Rehab wanted to try a 'different approach', 'The cheap alternative' that left whoever was given the job no ****ing chance at all and leaves the overall value and effectiveness of the squad diminished. I am excited about Silva (tempered with a good dose of reality). Exciting second half of the season? Well it will be more interesting than if Phelan or Bruce was here. We are still bolloxed thanks to boy blunder and if you think that is being negative hard cheese old chap.