All over the news we have bid between ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã35 and ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã40 million for Torres,probably a load of ****e to sell papers but it will still get up the scousers nose whether its true or not!!!
Can't see the new owners sanctioning it. If it had been earlier on in the window, they'd have had time to find a replacement but probably too late now. Can you imagine if they did sell though? They'd be left with N'gog and, erm, well, that's about it. NESV would get it even worse than H&G!
There is a ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã50 million buy out clause written into his contract so if Roman is prepared to go that high we can definitely have him. It would be funny to watch the scousers lose their prize assets and then have no time to get a replacement. It's quite obvious that they are skint. Suarez is a very good player with a frightening scoring rate and has massive potential. Liverpool only want to pay ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã12 million, which I think is way too low and so do Ajax. They might get him for ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã20 million but they obviously don't have the cash. I would much rather see ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã35 million spent elsewhere. We could get Lukaku for ÃÆÃâÃâ ââ¬â¢ÃÆââââ¬Å¡Ã¬Ãâ¦Ã¡ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã18 million and could get an attacking midfielder at the same time.
Would love to see Torres at SB but cant see it happening.(would be a little concerned over his injury history)..........Lukaku or Aguero would be nice but will probably have to wait till the summer for either of those 2.
ssn prob more hype- 'Sky Sports understands that Fernando Torres has asked Liverpool to consider selling him to Chelsea after a bid was rejected in the early hours of Friday morning.'
PR move by Roman to appease the supporters, though not every one wants him. Would be good buy but questionable injury/fitness record and vulnerable to same again. As others have said better buys for less cash. If Roman was serious he should have made moves earlier in the window
He's left it a bit late but I guess Roman fancies his chances at 'chicken' - see who flinches first I reckon we might just get him...Pool will fold when the wonga gets high enough
What i don't understand is how he's going to fit into the current system. The only real way is to either drop Didier, or push Torres out to the wing where he'd be far less effective, and thus a bit of a waste, especially if the transfer reaches the realms of ÃÆÃââââ¬à ¡ÃÆââ¬Å¡Ãâã50m++. I know Didier's not been the best in recent times, and isn't the youngest but last week he looked back to his best and it'd be probably the worst time to drop him at the minute. For me, Aguero would be a far more sensible, effective signing for Chelsea at the minute.
I agree with West in that Aguerro would be a better signing. Not sure where Torres fits into our 4-3-3 exactly? Aguerro is also younger and more versatile and we could play Aguerro on the right of a 4-3-3. Can Torres play there ? Not sure.So deos that mean we drop Drogba or go back to a 4-4-2 ?