Betz for Bantz

Nope.

Everyone already knows what it is that I agreed to.

My bet is with Archie.

There is nothing more to say on this subject.

 

If you're proposing that I carry an Avatar of Levy with the 'best chairman in the world' words underneath, then why are you bottling the reciprocal forfeit that you have a Wenger avatar with the words 'I've shat on Spurs for two decades' underneath ?

You can't have a one way bet where you carry no risk. That will earn you the @Spurlock 'Pussy boy' tag mate.

 

The question I put to you was rhetorical.

I think we all know that you cannot be trusted to honour any bet. The lads will remember how you shamefully tried to get out of our bet, when it looked odds-on that Spurs would finish above Arsenal. You only started to give it large, when it was confirmed that Arsenal would finish above Spurs, that season.

Thank you, but I think I will stick with my bet with Archie.

 

Rhetorical Nice backtracking.

And the part in bold, just Coming from you, the forum's biggest welcher.

 

Hardly.

I honoured my bet, and ended up carrying that Tony Adams avatar for around three times longer than required under the terms of the wager.

 

Don't be stupid HIAG.

Luvgonzo's rules were that neither you or I could choose our own avatar for that bet. You broke the rules and welched on the bet

 

Let's not resurrect this again! It's been done to death, already.


I lost the bet fair and square, and I carried an avatar of Tony Adams for far, far longer than I needed to.

What rankles with you is that I didn't carry the avatar of Tony Adams that you wanted.

 

It has been done to death. I'm not sure why you're still trying to deny that you welched it.
Luvgonzo's rules were clear, we were not permitted to choose our own avatars. You did just that and broke the rules, thus welched the bet.

 

Yes, we all know that that is what you believe.

Best get back to your tragic Please Show Me You Love Me! thread, and award yourself a pot-load of self-love points, Pix.

 

It's not a belief, it's a fact.

Luvgonzo's rules were that we weren't permitted to choose our own avatar. You broke those rules and welched on the bet.

Everybody saw you do it mate. The fact that you still to this day can't admit that, is indicative of your flawed character.

 

All the lads know that you need to believe that, Pix.

 

No need for belief mate. It's fact. You broke the rules and welched on the bet.

How many times are you going to repeat this **** up ?

 

No, it isn't fact.

Roofie QC took you apart on this matter, not so long ago.

Please don't force Roofie to re-own your sorry ass.

Why not console yourself by awarding yourself with a bucket-load of self-love points in your tragic I Need You To Tell Me You Love Me! game?

 

Wrong. It is fact. And here is the proof. The quote from Luvgonzo stating 'They cannot pick their avatar'
http://www.not606.com/threads/the-haig-vs-piskie-bet-thread.322678/page-3#post-8881599

Also the following quotes are you agreeing to those rules and saying 'Yes I'm in, if I lose the bet then do your worst and I will put up for it for the first month of the season'
http://www.not606.com/threads/the-haig-vs-piskie-bet-thread.322678/page-3#post-8881643

And just in case you're still trying to squirm out of it with roofies flawed logic about Luvgonzo not picking the avatar. Luv said 'please post any suggested avatars on here and I'll decide the winner'
http://www.not606.com/threads/the-haig-vs-piskie-bet-thread.322678/page-3#post-8881726

You broke the rules. Luv chose the avatar based on the suggestions offered. You then agreed to 'fully honour the terms of the bet'. You welched on it and confirmed your status a pussy.

And you are still here getting owned on this very same issue

 

****!

Pixie, you kept a record of everything!

Jesus! You have just reached record depths of tragedy!

 

Proving you wrong is very easy to do mate

#welcher

 

@Skylarker

i need you to sort this **** out for me mate

 

Already sorted. HIAG is a proven welcher. No more debate needed, unless he tries to deny it again.

 

Time and time again.

 

As I've said many times before. HIAG is the village idiot who comes back time and again to touch the electric fence to see if it is still live.