1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

You decide !!!!!

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by KingEric07., Jun 8, 2011.

  1. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    After today potential signings of Jones for United and Henderson for Liverpool which club do you think has got the better value deal and which player would you rather have ?
     
    #1
  2. Valencia25

    Valencia25 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Us because more teams where in for him

    Arsenal
    Spurs
    You guys
    and Chelsea
     
    #2
  3. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    You guys ??
     
    #3
  4. Valencia25

    Valencia25 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    611
    Likes Received:
    0
    Liverpool sorry u aint a pool fan my bad
     
    #4
  5. Four2Three1©

    Four2Three1© Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    1,379
    Likes Received:
    3
    Who cares?
    Just enjoy the signing for what it is.. <ok>
     
    #5
  6. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    Chill out it's just a question.

    Anyway according to other posts Jones has failed his medical
     
    #6
  7. Kamran - KingKoscielny

    Kamran - KingKoscielny Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,254
    Likes Received:
    2
    Phil Jones has failed his medical, he might not be joining UTD.
     
    #7
  8. CSMorant

    CSMorant New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Abit premature to talk about which deal is better, Henderson cost more yes but if his performances helped Liverpool to silverware then he'd be the better signing regardless of fee.
     
    #8
  9. Nay_12

    Nay_12 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2011
    Messages:
    159
    Likes Received:
    1
    If both deals go through id say Jones is by far the better deal; unlike with henderson no ones really questioned his price tag as he has played like a player thats worth that much in todays over inflated market where as henderson has lots of potential but is probably only worth around 14/15 million not the 20mil + ngog or including ngog that has been agreed on
     
    #9
  10. Swarbs

    Swarbs Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2011
    Messages:
    15,533
    Likes Received:
    1,371
    Difficult to tell at this stage. A lot depends on how they fit into their respective teams.

    Although I am surprised that the deals ended up that way. We're the ones who need a CM, when Liverpool already seem to have three that they are happy with. Likewise, we already have three top class CBs and decent backups in Evans and O'Shea, whilst Liverpool have Agger who is crocked, Carragher who is 33, and Skrtel who is ****. It seems like the two clubs would have done better by signing the other player, although I'm not sure Henderson would be an automatic first choice even in the current Utd midfield.
     
    #10

  11. tunns®

    tunns® I'm a camp pirate

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,652
    Likes Received:
    174
    I think it's good business, he's young, well touted, English, and a reasonable price. Works well with Smalling, and with our ageing injury prone CB'S he is a long term ideal.

    Everyone(including myself) has harped on about a CM, how far into negotiations are we do not know, just because the Jones deal is near to completion doen't mean that latter is work in progress, give things a chance, do everyone actually think that the "jONES" transfer just happened overnight? - this must of been mooted some time ago!
     
    #11
  12. Chief

    Chief Northern Simpleton
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    39,293
    Likes Received:
    27,105
    I think we had our eye on him and Liverpool's interest made us jump in earlier than planned. I'm fairly sure he wasn't on this summers shopping list but he must be seen to be excellent potential for us to move to prevent him going to Liverpool or the Arse.
    That clearly can't be said of Henderson as we didn't compete for him.
     
    #12
  13. luvgonzo

    luvgonzo Pisshead

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    108,312
    Likes Received:
    67,796
    With them both being so young the answer to the OP's question will be in 4-5 years time.
     
    #13
  14. MUFCOK

    MUFCOK Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    If he has been signed for that much money do we think that could mean the end for Vidic? I doubt he would come in for that price to sit on the bench. Though can't he play in Defensive Midfield? Maybe not this season but perhaps Vidic has indicated he wants to play elsewhere. I think it is a fantastic sign that in the future our CB pairing for many years will be two young English players. Good signing.
     
    #14
  15. sugchesterunited

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    1
    Course he would come in and sit on the bench... only the biggest headed 19 year olds would think they could move to United and go straight into the position which is our most strongest.
     
    #15
  16. Doyler

    Doyler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    0
    £16m was the agreed fee minus £6.5 for Ngog. £9.5 paid in installments with potentially another £3.5m to bring to £19.5 based on appearances/goals/assists etc. He has played 71 premiership games against Jones 34 appearances who's costing £17m altho im unsure on how the payments are working with the deal. The only way of claiming who got the better deal is to judge them next May! (providing they both sign!)
     
    #16
  17. KingEric07.

    KingEric07. cape wearing twat

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    8,788
    Likes Received:
    205
    However considering that nobody on here has a crystal ball ( well maybe Valencia25 does with his Nani predictions ) it's simply asking for current opinion on the transfers.
     
    #17
  18. MUFCOK

    MUFCOK Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    1,448
    Likes Received:
    0
    I know the lad would do as he is told but it seems like Ferguson has rushed into this one. Maybe he knows Vidic or Ferdinand will not be at the club come Summer 2012 and so he had planned to sign Jones then but the interest from Liverpool, Arsenal and Spurs has made him go in for him now. This season we are going to have an embarrassment of riches at CB. Smalling played his fair share last season but will there be room this year for Jones as well?
     
    #18
  19. Chief

    Chief Northern Simpleton
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    39,293
    Likes Received:
    27,105
    We haven't bought a 19 year old centre half to replace Vidic now, he's for the future. He will sit on the bench, as any 19 year old would be absolutely privileged to do, and he'll learn his trade. It's Ferdinand who'll be gone before before Vidic anyway, his injury record is taking its toll.

    Both seem good signings with the potential to be excellent signings. It's impossible to tell who got the best deal.
     
    #19
  20. tunns®

    tunns® I'm a camp pirate

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    3,652
    Likes Received:
    174
    I agree, as I said in my earlier post, we have an ageing crock at CB as in Rio, and Wes, Vidic is not in that equation - but could get injured or suspended, I do not however think he is leaving OT anytime soon, he's fully commited to United.
     
    #20

Share This Page