It's slimy and dishonest to bring up this garbage again, totally out of context: Yes they did. But why mention that alongside fan disorder when it was the blundering, clumsy police horses who trampled on their legs? The implication by not explaining this totally irrelevant sentence is that fans broke the police officer's legs. Why make that implication unless you're deliberately trying to portray Leeds fans in a bad light? http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co....hunt_police_photo_line_up_exclusive_1_4114394 I was gonna dob in all my mates to the Police, but I don't think I'll bother now. No doubt those photographed did nothing worse than chuck a bottle/rock at some riot officer with a **** off shield who thinks all football fans are scum. They were setting dogs on people left, right and centre after that game and I hope they don't capture any of these suspects.
