Would you have:

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Any team that would have him would be seen to be condoning what he seems to have done . . . . an acceptance that would probably be vilified by everyone else.

I've got no doubt, whatsoever, that he'll be very disruptive in the dressing room, too, whichever one he ends up in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson and Snaggey
No. Too much baggage and press attention.
No, he wasn't found guilty of anything, nor was he proven innocent (not that proving one's innocence is a requirement of UK law of course)

The social media stuff, the alleged recordings and the nature of how evidence was withdrawn all suggests something murky

I'd be steering well clear - we don't need that sort of attention after recent events
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iain and Dorset
The media and panellists who like to have a go at Safc for any reason would be delighted at the opportunity. But they would totally wet themselves with pleasure when suddenly remembering Adam Johnson and the chance of “ doubling up” and calling it a trend at the club
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back