1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Why not 4-4-2?

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by Highball_QPR, Aug 3, 2016.

  1. Highball_QPR

    Highball_QPR Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    147
    So, let's be honest, Polter is a hard worker but not exactly a striker to get us promoted. Washington clearly has some talent but is not yet the complete article. Basically neither one on their own is as good as Austin was and, frankly, we will not get promoted this season because of that fact. So why not play them together and see if a partnership can grow, alongside the idea that each will gain experience? I heard on the commentary during the Watford game that you can't do this because where would you play Chery? But I'm sorry, he seems OK and all, and good luck to him gaining the No. 10 shirt and everything, but is he really that good? At least give it a go ffs.
     
    #1
  2. Sooperhoop

    Sooperhoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    35,545
    Likes Received:
    27,936
    If you played a 'predatory' striker alongside Polter it may work but you'd be outgunned in midfield unless you play three at the back. Gregory plays alongside Morrison at Millwall and got a hatful last season, I doubt Washington is that type of striker...
     
    #2
  3. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    We should play to our strengths, which is Chery as a number 10.
     
    #3
  4. terryb

    terryb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    592
    Please explain to me what is the major difference between 4-4-2 & 4-4-1-1.

    Chery IS a second forward.

    He also fits in well with Polter. Although I don't think we will be excessive goalscorers this season, Polter & Chery will both be in double figures (comfortably).
     
    #4
    KPDHoopster and sb_73 like this.
  5. Eamon Holmes

    Eamon Holmes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    6,057
    Likes Received:
    1,230
    4-4-2 looks like this ...
    please log in to view this image
     
    #5
    Shawswood likes this.
  6. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651

    You there Sunday Tel?

    4-4-2 usually has two out and out forwards.
    4-4-1-1 usually has a deeper player, like Teddy Sheringham in behind
    This player also helps in midfield, making it very similar to 4-2-3-1.
     
    #6

  7. Highball_QPR

    Highball_QPR Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    209
    Likes Received:
    147
    Leicester.jpg

    Or this haha.
     
    #7
  8. qprbeth

    qprbeth Wicked Witch of West12 Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    14,982
    Likes Received:
    13,569
    Chery is the real Mcoy....I think BFG and Chery will work.
    .
     
    #8
  9. Uber_Hoop

    Uber_Hoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    18,613
    Likes Received:
    28,533
    Of course you're right, Col, but I can't help but feel that 4-4-2 can work with the right group of players, or might be the most effective formation for a certain group of players. The danger of being overrun in midfield can be offset if you have a team capable of moving the ball quickly and, ideally, a competent wide man or two The other thing is that having two forwards further upfield can force the opposition to sit further back to cover them, thus making their five in midfield play deeper and therefore potentially less effective. This is all bollocks if you don't have the right players, of course.
     
    #9
  10. Didley Squat

    Didley Squat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2012
    Messages:
    27,416
    Likes Received:
    64,943
    Sorry, I don't see that. ........................ l see 9064.

    Anyway, on a serious note, to get maximum benefit from the start of the season, we should play two forwards and not a lone striker.
    Possibly one up from the other but nevertheless, two strikers.

    If we are going to hit the ground running, we must be positive.
     
    #10
  11. peter1954qpr

    peter1954qpr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    3,864
    Likes Received:
    2,430
    There's the problem you mentioned the word Positive, ruined your argument
     
    #11
  12. terryb

    terryb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2013
    Messages:
    1,248
    Likes Received:
    592
    I'm there Sunday Col.

    See you at the usual spot at half time. I might go to our position when I arrive as well.

    I can't make any drinking meet prior to the match. AND I probably need a pint or three as I'm now in the backrow with Roller! And Beth! And Connell!
     
    #12
    rangercol likes this.
  13. Uber_Hoop

    Uber_Hoop Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    18,613
    Likes Received:
    28,533
    Bit kinky. Why not just shake hands?
     
    #13
  14. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651

    Spot on.
     
    #14

Share This Page