Why isn't there an NSFW in the title of Advice about Women?

Just opened it up and am extremly lucky my boss wasn't looking over my shoulder. Come on lads, a lot of us go on here at work. Tash, you need to sort this out, I know you've taken some stick for the thread but that doesn't mean you should jeopardise other people's jobs because you took a bit of grief for starting it. Please remove that first picture until a Mod manages to add NSFW to the title.

I know this is partly my fault for opening it because I knew the nature of the thread but the last time I checked it it didn't have graphic images. I just wanted to see what the latest banter was on there. The NSFW system is excellent and accomodating if we all have the respect to use it.

 

Tash can't do that. Only a mod can (or the person who posted te picture )

 

The person who posted the picture is Tash, who wouldn't worry about whether something was suitable for work as he doesn't have a job or a little bit of common sense it would seem.

 

he's normally pretty good for the nsfw thing so bit surprised if he's done it just pm him i'm sure he'll do it

 

He did on purpose so that the thread doesn't keep getting brought up. Will try and have a word with a mod to put a NSFW in the title .

 

Ah sorry, i haven't read it since it was bumped again and i thought you were refering to a couple of wierd pictures that are a couple of pages in

 

I've PMed Tash as per Secret Ingredients advice. Cheers lads.

 

Yeah the original thread was safe, but as far as I can work out he was sick of people bumping it because it made him look like a fool. So he edited the opening post to have nsfw content because naturally that is the most sane and sensible thing to do...

 

Yeh, but posting pictures that could potentially get people into **** at work, makes him look even more like a fool. Its a shame really because, on his day, he does provide some good, structured articles, that do get a good solid conversation going.

 

Yeah I was being sarcastic, totally bizarre and stupid thing to do.

 

Yeah well if people like GRB hadn't started **** stirring and bumping the article repeatedly then we wouldn't even be having this conversation. I said to let the article die down or else i'd start posting pics like that without NSFW, but other people decided they were bored and needed to entertainment because their lives are so dull and they like they **** over internet drama.

I know my actions weren't exactly fair on the people at work, but this all happened because people keep on bumping a thread that should have been deleted months ago, and they wanted to kick start another flame war off. AG decided it would be better for this possibility to occur so him and a few others could piss themselves laughing, rather than just deleting the article and letting it die already.

I've deleted the pics, now delete the ****ing article already for christ sake.

 

The difference is, we're allowed to bump articles, but posting explicit material without NSFW tags is against forum rules and you could have got people in trouble for that.

 

i hope the article isn't deleted!! I'm only on pg 14!

 

please log in to view this image

 

Nominee for "Understatement of the decade".

People do lose their jobs for that.

Engage brain and then react.

 

Sorry for bumping it Jeez

 

Yeah well if the thread had been deleted like i asked, then all this wouldn't have kicked off. Some people just have to have their laughs.

Now watch this whole situation get blown out of proportion like plenty of others in the past.

 

It's a bit late now.

 

And in some professions, like mine, would find it almost near impossible to get another job on that profession