neither mate tbh, i would go 2 up top from the start, no point in finding yourself up against it then going 442, go for it and revert to 451 if needs be, is my opinion against that mercinary lot
i would be delighted if we did play with two if we had a better midfield who works and had quick players , but more confident of a point with a big midfield and one up front. if the gods are with us this game will go a long way to our survival and rangers demise , i have never felt less confident about playing a side who is rock bottom
If MON went back to 4-5-1 its got to be Fletch. He already has goals so we know with the service he's capable. Sincerely hope he goes all out for the win tho. Would be nice to start playing prior to going 2-0 down, just for a change.
If i had to choose, i'd give Graham a go... But the reality is we need the points and are playing a **** team who are rock bottom, if MoN reverts back to one up front for this game, he needs to be shot with ****.
Fletcher is one of the first names on the teamsheet. If we go 4-4-2 i think we'll get out numbered in the middle and beaten. QPR have some cracking midfielders and we have grandad larsson and a rookie in the middle in a 4-4-2. We also can't effectively play 4-4-2 with Colback at left back because we lose whoever is left wing to being doubled up on. My team. ..........................Mignolet.......................... Gardner......Oshea......bramble......Colback ....................N'dayie...Vaughan................... Larsson..............Johnson..............Sessegnon ...........................Fletcher..............................
Quite like the look of that side - Obviously if Catts and Rose still aren;t fit then it'd be my starting line up too - Catts to replace Vaughan and Rose for Colback - nothing against Graham I just think Johnson would be better in behind the front man as he has that extra something to play that killer pass and Larsson could do his usual 70 minutes and then McClean come on for the final 20 and swap Sess into Right wing
