http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-trending-36103443 You've got to give him a chance - haven't you ? At least he's asking, and not just 'taking'. Just because he's serving 4 sentences for sexual assault, it doesn't mean to say there will be any more. ..... mind you, that's only the number of times he got caught................ Anyway - look on the bright side - his age range of victims will give hope for many women of pension age and above.
Serving four life sentences in a Texas prison does mean there won't be any more victims you melon. Unless it's against other men in the big house, these stupid women are perfectly safe from Mr Torres.
Thank you for that. I really hadn't thought that he might not be out of prison for a very long time - if at all -- because that fact just wasn't obvious !!!!!!! Maybe I was able to think beyond the confines of a box / prison cell -- and having thoughts about what society might need to do to try to protect future possible victims ( of either gender ) ( upon any possible release from prison ), -- such as castration - or a tattoo of the letter R on their forehead. ......but - rest assured, Mr.DONUTS - your reply is the best so far in this thread.
He won't be coming out of that Texas prison cell so society is very safe . He has no Internet access and can only write letters to communicate with the outside World which are probably vetted by the guards. The guy's in jail ffs if he gets his jollies writing letters to people and any of the recipients choose to visit him then I don't really see the outrage. He raped he was caught and will never be trusted to walk in free society ever again. This isn't enough for you ? You condescending prick. PS . I hope you get wrongly convicted of rape and as a result forcibly castrated and an R tattooed on your head.
Mr.Donuts I can't thank you enough for replicating most of the original article. It is so heartwarming that we have good people such as yourself - who are prepared to take the time and expend the energy to state the bleeding obvious - even if I had grasped that fact in the first place. Please do not be put off by my condescending nature ............. and it is good of you to digress this thread little - by introducing incorrect convictions, and the implications of an unsafe judgement --- after all, you can't stick back a person's head once you've chopped it off ! -- Well, actually, you can - but then it becomes like Toby's - it doesn't work well ( that's just for T liking your post ).
You are more than welcome A R can I suggest that you take up residence in Saudi Arabia if you are keen on brutal sentencing towards convicts and enjoy mutilation at the hands of the state. Kind regards Duncan
All prisoners, regardless of their crimes, should be whacked in the cods with a cricket bat for the regulation 47 minutes. Rapists and murderers should then be executed. All foreign criminals, regardless of their crimes, should also be executed. All prisoners who survive the agony of the cod-whacking punishment should then be forced to break rocks. Under the sea.
I'd wear him down into a gibbering idiot - with some people that's an improvement ( I'm not pointing any finger - but we all know who I mean, eh ***** ! )
