Not sure if any of you saw in the news today, but the Accrington Stanley chairman had a bit of a go at the premier league.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39857490
In responding, they had the sheer audacity to question whether "he wishes the Premier League to continue the support we currently provide for his and other clubs in the EFL."
The cheek of it! As if they don't have an obligation! As if they're not destroying the very essence of the game itself! As if the solidarity payments they're giving are anywhere near enough when many football league clubs are struggling to survive! As if they don't have a ludicrous record tv rights deal. As if they don't have (and this is totally irrelevant) a sexist chief exec.
If they actually did any good for the game, rather than use it as a cash cow with which to fill their pockets, I might understand.
I feel like PS and all other football league chairman should stand together with Mr Holt and tell the PL where to stick it.
Sorry, rant over...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/39857490
In responding, they had the sheer audacity to question whether "he wishes the Premier League to continue the support we currently provide for his and other clubs in the EFL."
The cheek of it! As if they don't have an obligation! As if they're not destroying the very essence of the game itself! As if the solidarity payments they're giving are anywhere near enough when many football league clubs are struggling to survive! As if they don't have a ludicrous record tv rights deal. As if they don't have (and this is totally irrelevant) a sexist chief exec.
If they actually did any good for the game, rather than use it as a cash cow with which to fill their pockets, I might understand.
I feel like PS and all other football league chairman should stand together with Mr Holt and tell the PL where to stick it.
Sorry, rant over...
