1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What would be the biggest lose for the teams - RVP or Modric leaving?

Discussion in 'Tottenham Hotspur' started by bobo_97, Aug 14, 2012.

  1. bobo_97

    bobo_97 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,558
    Likes Received:
    271
    There are speculations that RVP is leaving (daaa) and also that Modric is leaving for RM.

    Modric - the heart beat of Spurs. The only purchase so far (as I am aware) is Sigurdsson
    RVP - the finisher for Arsenal. Replacements: Podolski, Giroud

    Which loss will have the biggest impact?

    (wanted to post on Arsenal and Spurs forum bit not sure if that is possible - so dont it manually instead)
     
    #1
  2. Sir_Red

    Sir_Red Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    9,326
    Likes Received:
    687
    RVP, he scored almost all their goals last season - even though the goons get all touchy if you say they're a one man team. Can't see Giroud and Podolski filling in for him.
     
    #2
  3. SpursDisciple

    SpursDisciple Booking: Mod abuse - overturned on appeal
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    30,130
    Likes Received:
    16,888
    We've also bought Vertonghen. If Modric goes, we will definitely buy, the assumption is that uncertainty over his future is slowing down a number of other signings.
     
    #3
  4. humanbeingincroydon

    humanbeingincroydon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Messages:
    69,845
    Likes Received:
    30,612
    Van Persie - 30 league goals is hard to replace.
     
    #4
  5. KingHotspur

    KingHotspur Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    25,259
    Likes Received:
    31,486
    Losing Modric will be a massive blow but I think RVP is needed at ArseAnal more than Modric is at Spurs.
     
    #5
  6. humanbeingincroydon

    humanbeingincroydon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2011
    Messages:
    69,845
    Likes Received:
    30,612
    Losing Modric will be a blow, no doubt about it, but we have players who can play in his position - Huddlestone and Carroll certainly can, whilst Sigurdsson and even VDV can be deployed there. Will they be as effective? Probably not, but they can perform in that role.

    On the either hand, neither Giroud or Podolski will be scoring 30 goals in the league, but they could score that many between them. The issue there is if one or other doesn't perform, or is injured.
     
    #6
  7. redwhiteandermblue

    redwhiteandermblue Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    6,647
    Likes Received:
    2,281
    Losing Modric is not nearly as crucial to Spurs as losing RVP would be to Arsenal. In most cases, I'd rather lose a top striker than a top playmaker, but in this case, Spurs have so much passing ability that losing their playmaker will impact them less than it would most, and RVP had such an enormous share of the goals that losing him could be devastating--depending, of course, on how the replacements do. It's clear from this board that everyone here thinks replacing Adebayor is going to be more crucial than replacing Modric.

    As others said, we can try Carroll or Huddlestone there. It will be very tempting to try Gylfi or VDV as well, especially as it looks like the best way to keep them both on the field when it's clear they should both start. If I were AVB, I'd try testing out Gylfi's supposedly excellent motor by having him begin each possession as playmaker, then move forward to put him in assisting/scoring position. In any case, Spurs have a variety of options here.
     
    #7
  8. District Line

    District Line Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,366
    Likes Received:
    968
    Physically Modric by far

    Psychologically RVP by far

    Long term I feel losing RVP is more damaging that said Modric is head and shoulders better than any other Spurs player. Arsenal still have Cazorla and Podolski both of whom are reasonable players especially the former
     
    #8
  9. deedub93

    deedub93 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2011
    Messages:
    12,700
    Likes Received:
    8,707
    The sooner Modric goes the sooner Spurs can move on. Modric leaving will benifit Spurs.

    RVP has only had one extraordinary season for the goons, they survived when he was injured and will continue to survive. They just wont be in a position to challenge for top honours but they haven't been in that position for 6 years so nothing much will change really.

    I think losing Drogba will affect the Chavs more. He didn't score that many goals for them last year (12???) but the were often very important goals.
     
    #9
  10. Spurlock

    Spurlock Homeboy
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    74,858
    Likes Received:
    90,697
    The OP is a wind up merchant just not as sly as DL...who is unbelievably patronising...


    'the heartbeat of Spurs'

    'head and shoulders above any other Spurs player'


    DL bringing the level of **** he spouts about Spurs on his board to the Spurs board.

    Fuk off both of you <ok>
     
    #10

  11. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,319
    Likes Received:
    55,803
    I'd actually agree with the OP's assessment of Modric, to some extent, but not DL's, Dona.
    Make of that what you will.

    The Croatian's role was to basically start moves and get things going.
    He was very effective at it and needs to be replaced.
    Huddlestone can do a good job there, if he can get back to full fitness and Carroll seems to have a lot of potential, but we'll miss Modric if we don't bring in someone of a similar calibre.
     
    #11
  12. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    Depends who they're replaced with, doesn't it? Arsenal relied heavily on RVP's goals last season and we relied on Modric's playmaking for our play.

    If they're both sold and not replaced, we'll suffer more but if they're both sold and replaced then as I've said, it just depends on the quality brought in. They're both key players and unless replaced with a like for like they will result in a change in the way the sides play which in itself has it's own risks.
     
    #12
  13. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    I agree with what I think DL's hinting at by talking about the psychological blow of lowing Van Persie. It would mark a second consecutive season where they've lost their best player and with it being their 4th first 11 player to lose in just over a year might well continue the dominos with Song and Walcott already teetering.
     
    #13
  14. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,319
    Likes Received:
    55,803
    I meant his assessment of Modric as "head and shoulders better than any other Spurs player" YV, but I should've clarified.
    Sorry.
     
    #14
  15. Spurlock

    Spurlock Homeboy
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    74,858
    Likes Received:
    90,697
    The OPs previous 2 articles made me reach that conclusion PNP....anyone else asking such a question would have been fine....however I would say the bigger loss is surely to lose a player who scored 30 plus goals. The effect of losing Modric will not be that obvious for us.
     
    #15
  16. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,319
    Likes Received:
    55,803
    True Dona, but they'd lose the delivery method, where we'd be losing the supply, if you know what I mean.
    Hard to tell which will potentially have the biggest impact, in my opinion.
     
    #16
  17. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    Reading it again it's clear :emoticon-0111-blush
     
    #17
  18. District Line

    District Line Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,366
    Likes Received:
    968
    Wow. Where has this come from?

    I don't think you could find many neutrals that wouldn't agree Modric is your best player. He's the only world class player in your squad and his contribution to the side shouldn't be undervalued. I think he's one of the top 3/4 midfielders in the world of his type.

    I never thought the day would come where I sing the praises of a Spurs player and get told to **** off but we live in strange times I guess :emoticon-0108-speec
     
    #18
  19. District Line

    District Line Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,366
    Likes Received:
    968
    I just think without Modric you have to almost change your entire way of playing, your ball retention in midfield won't be as good. Arsenal are just effectively replacing RVP with a poorer player. Their style of playing won't change. However selling RVP will just pave the way for the others to leave and confirm Arsenal as a selling club, thats where I think the danger lies
     
    #19
  20. Modric has been a good player for us, but he's been no Gazza.

    We got our first ever 4th with him being injured most of the season, and THudd was our most important player. Modric came to the fore when he returned from injury, just as THudd got injured! If THudd is back to full fitness, he'll become our main man once again. People have forgotten just how good THudd can be.
     
    #20

Share This Page