Im never going away again, that was ****ing terrible and they should be ashamed of there self woolford is the biggest pile of **** ive ever seen lee johnson is better than him and thats saying something, we were completley lost without adomah and pearson to balance the team and the only highlight of the game was yannick bolasie Maynard you can **** off, usless!!!!!!!!!!!!.
Maynard played well today then http://www.otib.co.uk/index.php?/topic/142869-disgusted-with-maynard/page__pid__1494173#entry1494173 Del needs to drop the " undropables", Maynard and Skuse being the two and agree on Woolford he is ****
Sigh.. Even the Brighton fans have a thread on how bad Maynard was. http://www.northstandchat.com/showthread.php?225742-If-Nicky-Maynard-is-worth-over-%A36million Best for all concerned if he goes sharpish before Ashton Gate turns on him. Should've been dropped a while back for poor form, the fact he's leaving doesn't matter.
To be honest I do not really get DM tactics. I can see he is making signings and hopefully long term he will have the players to play the way he wants but at the moment the 4-3-3 is such a strange formation to me to play. In the last home game and other games this season it looked like we had 3 centre midfielders, a right winger and 2 forwards so it was no surprise that all the attacking from the other teams come down our left hand side as there is no one on the left of midfield. We either play two wide players with a 4-4-2 with Wood and someone up front (looks like maynard up front atm) or you go 4-2-3-1 but at the moment playing 4-4-2 with 3 centre midfielders and only 1 wide player gives no balance to the team and shows to the other team exactly which side of the pitch we are going to attack from as it limits our options. As for some of the players I do think we have a manager who hopefully will drop them if they consistantly do not perform and might be why he has been active in the transfer market.
Sa1nt when were Southampton known as the world? Must really hurt that a team down the bottom of the table did the double over u
