Wolves have just let him go. Not bad keeper with Reading. http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11661_6963190,00.html
Not bad at all. However, because of the lack of football he's played in the last 6 months I'd only give him a trial.
Would be a good addition, liked him when i've seen him in goal. Would wages or anything be an issue? If not he might be worth a punt.
Very solid keeper on his day, and wages shouldn't be too drastic. Unfortunately i don't want us to be in a 'wage-bidding war' with another team. If we can get guzan on a considerably lower wage, i don't believe the gulf in class is so large.
He's a good keeper, but he's 39 in a few weeks, we'd be looking for a replacement almost from day one.
Hahnemann is a shocking keeper and as already mentioned is 38. Guzan is a far better keeper and is 12 years younger. I'd rather us give Oxley a try as number 2
Never trust a bald man with a goatee. But on a more serious note, he isn't a 'shocking keeper', he's a viable option. But I can't see him playing on much further than forty.
Of all the Amercian goalkeepers in England Marcus thingy has to be the worse. City could do a lot worse by going for Irish international and free agent Joe Murphy, unless he has already gone somewhere.
No. He does seem to have extreme balding. I thought Rooney had it bad. Not a patch on Guzan. Poor ****er.