1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

What a ****

Discussion in 'Liverpool' started by alexb, Oct 7, 2012.

  1. alexb

    alexb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,909
    Likes Received:
    49
    #1
  2. ITS_NOT_JUST_A_GAME

    ITS_NOT_JUST_A_GAME Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    972
    Likes Received:
    36
    I think Pulis is right.
     
    #2
  3. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Pulis is right and of course come Monday, HUTH WILL get a ban. Surez sadly will not. What is worse is a quote from Brendan Rodgers.

    When asked about the dive by Suarez in the 2nd half he said. " I did'nt see it" Well how come that The WHOLE of Anfield did.
    And I'm NOT defending Robert Huth at all. He probably WILL get a BAN and if proven he stamped that fine. The fact that Suarez dived is not fine unless you are Brendan Roders. Even liverpool fans say he dived bar ONE poster.

    And I'm not nuetral am I.
     
    #3
  4. PleaseNotPoll

    PleaseNotPoll Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Messages:
    96,332
    Likes Received:
    55,818
    Huth's stamp:

    please log in to view this image


    Doesn't look like he really stamps exactly, more of a step, but it's a clear red card.
    He'll get done for it.
     
    #4
  5. TheAmericanConnection

    TheAmericanConnection Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    8
    Having watched the game at home I thought it was a stamp but wasn't sure if it was deliberate. From what I can see from this gif, Huth's looking down, knows exactly were Suarez is laying, and shortens his stride to stamp on him, that just ain't his natural stride pattern at all.

    Can't stand Pulis, never could, another one of those who talks in what seems like a benevolent, moderate, and honerable way, when in fact he is the most capricious arbitor of events on the pitch were his thuggish team are concerned, he is a disgrace.

    That said, seeing Huth's stamp I can see, in his usual way, why he is so keen to change the agenda.
     
    #5
  6. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Sure Huth will get banned, deliberate or not.. But what happnes to Suarez? Exactly nothing will happen. He dived as did a Swansea player last weekend. Davies I think? and he WAS booked.
     
    #6

  7. Lucaaas

    Lucaaas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    Tony Pulis is a proper scruff. And another one of the Alex Ferguson boot licking gang. **** him and anyone who takes what he says seriously.
     
    #7
  8. Hash.

    Hash. pure daycent

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,043
    Likes Received:
    1,423

    Suarez was booked against Sunderland when the replays and former Referee Graham Poll all suggest it was a Penalty. &#8203;These things even themselves out over a season <whistle>
     
    #8
  9. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    That's fair enough, I respect your oppinions but..
    What do you think should happend to Suarez once the FA see that dive 2nd half? And the kickout at Begovic?
     
    #9
  10. Lucaaas

    Lucaaas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    14,768
    Likes Received:
    3,980
    So where exactly are you saying we should be drawing the line? If a player tugging a shirt in the box isn't penalised during the game should he be banned/fined/punished too? As its also an illegal act.

    Should Peter Crouch have been punished retrospectively for handballing against Man City?

    No, don't be stupid, there wouldn't be any players left if they were retrospectively punished for everything that the referee didn't see during the game. Don't understand the obsession this country and its media has with diving when defenders cheat at set pieces etc weekly.
     
    #10
  11. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    ?
    Let's stick to the topic at hand.. we're talking about Huth? and Suarez? And I asked you as simple question WHAT should the FA do with Suarez?

    As for the shirtpulling etc, it happens in EVERY game. Same thing applies. Shirtpulling is NOT always a BLATANT attempt to stop or gain a clear goalscoring chance.

    TRYING to CON a ref by going down like the Titanic is. i.e. A Pen is more often than not scored. Had that dive been seen as a pen today. We would not be having this debate would we? BUT yet AGAIN Suarez dives and hey feckin ho your'e manager say's.

    I did'nt see it. For the record, neither did he SEE Huth stamp on Suarez. WHAT exactly WAS B Rodger's watching then? He did say " I have NO complaints"

    (Edit) Re Crouch YES it should not have been allowed. simple innit.
     
    #11
  12. TheAmericanConnection

    TheAmericanConnection Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    249
    Likes Received:
    8
    Well first off from the point of view of you guys, and Pulis's agenda, it is probably good that the ref didn't do anything because that leaves the door open for the review system or whatever its called, as I don't think they can do anything if the ref has already acted and spoken to the player.

    Not sure what they will do to be honest, looked like a clear dive to me and as I pointed out in another thread Saurez has now given the media the golden opportunity, which they won't fail to take, to talk about something other than the JT situation, and just when Suarez starting to rise above it all. In light of what "I" and I state I because its just my view, see as a number of injustices that Suarez has more or less ignored recently, IE. proper penalty shouts being refused, being kicked to bits by a lot of teams, generally being viewed as the devil incarnate, the FA may just ignore the dive, you may call it being lenient; or they may not care about criticism they have had regarding the treatment of Suarez, and just follow the book and call him on it again, I don't know.

    The kickout at Begovic, I didn't see! Watching Liverpool at home tends to result in me running to the kitchen every 4 minutes for comfort food, usually custard creams, 53p for a double pack from tesco, and I honestly haven't seen it, but will watch MOTD2 tonight and will no doubt see it replayed a couple of times. All adds up to him getting more frustrated unfortunately and not sure, unless we start winning more regularly, whether he will get any better, or I will manage to loose any weight.
     
    #12
  13. Hash.

    Hash. pure daycent

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    18,043
    Likes Received:
    1,423

    Should Suarez's yellow against Sunderland be rescinded ?
     
    #13
  14. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    FACT
    They CAN ban Huth IF they see fit. BECAUSE the ref must NOT have seen and or not booked ~Suarez for the DIVE. Lee Mason as I see it seem's he thought it was neither a dive or a foul. Which seem's insane if you go by the rules. But did'nt book him,. The FA can do """" all. I think?
     
    #14
  15. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Of course it should. Then ban the cheat for diving today. <ok> But they won't do either.
     
    #15
  16. DirtyFrank

    DirtyFrank Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2011
    Messages:
    26,647
    Likes Received:
    8,514
    I find this hilarious. The sheep really are easily led. Only in this country is there a hate campaign against diving as opposed to any other form of cheating. Why? Because its seen as a foreign import.

    Stoke get a tsk tsk, shake of the head & smile for playing a brand of football that belongs in the 70's. their manager asking for retrospective punishment deliberately sends his team to go out week after week & act like thugs but that's ok because it reminds the xenophobic media and fans of the glorious by gone era of the "beautiful" English game.

    It's the same with the media treatment of Paul Scholes, "he can't help it" they say when he commits what is essentially assault time after time but its ok. It's English cheating not that dirty foreign stuff.

    This double standard at every level of football is what is making the game a farce.

    Personally. Cheating is cheating. If its spotted on the pitch by the ref then fine. None of this retroactive nonsense. From what I saw, the ref viewed both incidents & disgracefully took no action and that's the end of it. By all means demote a ref for getting it wrong but this witch hunt has to stop.

    You'll see Alan Shearer do his moral judgement on diving when he used to quite deliberately elbow at least one defender in the face a game. But that's ok because thuggery is the English cheating, manly, not this dirty foreign stuff.

    Game from top to bottom is full of hypocrites.
     
    #16
  17. Kylo_Toure

    Kylo_Toure Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    10
    What should the FA do with Suarez? The same they do with all cases of diving, nothing. Or are you suggesting Suarez should be made an example of again? Everyone has marked Suarez as a diver, today's incident was certainly that, previously I have not see a case where Suarez has gone down without SOME contact, this also ignoring the continuing fouls against Suarez that were not punished (would you not agree that sly fouls / grabbing players ect. behind the refs back, or acting all innocent when a foul is called is also attempting to deceive the ref and equally cheating?). No one wants to see diving, but today the right outcome was given, no foul, no pen, nothing more to see here officer.
     
    #17
  18. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Great post this <ok>
    Just to point out that I also listened on radio our local station. Terry Conroy one of our greats was at the game and mentioned a "Kick at Begovic" so I may have to retract that comment IF MOTD don't highlight it.

    As for Suarez? Brilliant player but I honestly think he's is own worst enemy. Someone should just have a word with him inside the club. SAME applies to Huth too!
    Not seen it but it looks like it's a stamp to me. And I think the FA will see that tonight and Huth get's a 3 game ban. My GRIPE is that as you say, Suarez probably will not.

    For what it's worth, I think the FA know little and do F all anyway.. things are getting out of hand and I think? That's what is hacking Pulis off along with other Managers. e.g. Martinez at O.T. for saying it how it is IMO anyway. That dive last week by the Swansea defender was punished. I guess **** happens every week.
     
    #18
  19. Pottermouth 328

    Pottermouth 328 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    4,938
    Likes Received:
    65
    Honest oppinion from me?
    Suarez NEEDS to sort his head out as does Huth. see my latest post fella <ok> And the previous one. BOTH Huth and Suarez are a liabilty and neither is doing our clubs no favours right now. IMHO.
     
    #19
  20. BringBackfootie

    BringBackfootie New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    6,018
    Likes Received:
    52
    Stoke pull sh!t all over the pitch all game, huth should have had 3 yellows.

    Suarez goes over once belatedly after there WAS contact. Never kicked out at the keeper. Never touched him yet the stoke board say huth should have stomped suarez into the ground, man up ect.

    Stoke were a disgrace, johnson clattered when he had eyes on the ball, two footed tackle n stamp.

    But again, lets talk suarez for what he did. Fkcu off you twat. Your team are a stain on football
     
    #20

Share This Page