Never understood exactly why lower league sides so rarely invest heavily in scouts. All the biggest clubs have 10/12 scouts and massive amounts of data on pretty much everyone in the world. Fair enough, we couldn't afford it to the same scale but just one scout seems ludicrous. How about one to look at the next team we face, two/three always looking for senior players and 1/2 looking for youngsters? It might mean slightly more investment in the short-term, but it helps prevent the signing of any more Nathan Elders. How about a performance analyst, or a sports scientist, or a director of football? Every top club has the first two, most have the latter as well. If properly implemented, it should result in an improvement in the efficiency of the club, just so long as you don't do a Tottenham. There is a real stigma of intelligent, continental style set-ups in the lower leagues, the pig-headedness which is why there are so many hustle and bustle managers who believe that hard work is all that matters and are inherently suspicious of anyone with technical ability below 5 foot 10. It's stupid, really, and Tim Sherwood is displaying all the shortcomings of such a style. All other sports embrace the more technical nature of the games, look at Rugby - the head coaches sit in the stand with a multitude of computer screens, TV angles and statistical data. Football is so outdated, it's just ludicrous.