Vanguard Bears and Craig Whyte

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
EspaniaCelt said:
To be fair RB - these are vitally important questions.........for them! :emoticon-0136-giggl:emoticon-0136-giggl
Click to expand...

Oh I know. Vitally important.

I cannot believe they published this response;

DevAdvocate said:
CW – We were unaware of this case law and will look in to it
Click to expand...

It is so ****ing obvious that this meant....."there is no case law you stupid ****s" but they read it as "thanks for putting me on to that V Angered Bares. I'll get right on it".
 
RebelBhoy said:
It is so ****ing obvious that this meant....."there is no case law you stupid ****s" but they read it as "thanks for putting me on to that V Angered Bares. I'll get right on it".
Click to expand...

"The art of reading between the lines is as old as manipulated information" - Serge Schmemann. I suspect that this 'Vanguard' group got to meet Mr Whyte as he had more than a fair idea that they'd be somewhat unfamiliar with Mr Schmemann! <whistle>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back