Transfer Rumours Van Ginkel Wants Toon Move

I hope there is a purchase clause inserted into this deal in case he delivers (like I think he will).

http://whatculture.com/sport/newcas...-international-midfielder-wants-toon-move.php

Newcastle United may confirm their first signing of the summer this week – with Chelsea midfielder Marco van Ginkel believed to have indicated his willingness to move to the North East on loan.
The 22-year-old Dutch midfielder spent a frustrating 2014-15 campaign on loan at AC Milan but the Magpies believe they can get the best out of him.
Dutch outlet AD claim that Van Ginkel has received an offer from Newcastle and, after weighing it up, has decided that St James’ Park is the best destination for him.

please log in to view this image

Mike Egerton/PA Wire/Press Association Images





The presence of fellow Dutch internationals Tim Krul, Vurnon Anita and Daryl Janmaat on Tyneside is believed to have been convinced Van Ginkel that Newcastle is the right club for him.
A move for Van Ginkel in particular would show that the Magpies do have ambition, with the two-cap Dutch international having arrived at Chelsea for £8 million from Vitesse Arnhem in 2013 once Jose Mourinho returned to the Blues for a second time.
Although he has appeared just twice in the Premier League for Chelsea since as a result of an anterior cruciate knee-ligament injury he suffered back in September 2013, Van Ginkel moved to Milan on loan last summer.
In 16 appearances, Van Ginkel scored once but showed a creativity and composure on the ball that was severely lacking on Tyneside last season.
During his career to date, Van Ginkel has made a total of 131 appearances, scoring 24 times.

 

Let's just hope we want to make this happen as much as he does, and that his injury woes from last season don't prove to be habit forming. Another Dutch perma-crock is not what we need right now!

 

Lol, another item for sale with damaged goods label on. Is this what Carr does, find players who were good, fcked their knee thus come at a lower price?

Cough...cough...SDJ....cough...

 

Ba worked out pretty well for us though...

 

If there is no option for a permanent signing then we just need to forget it! May as well focus on Cabella instead

 

No, most definitely not.

Why are we helping Chelski improve their players as opposed to us improving our players.

Improve in the sense of giving them experience and game time.

 

If it were a choice between VG with no transfer clause or Sammy and Obertan combined I'd still choose the latter.

 

Before Chelsea signed him he looked proper mint in Holland. I'd take a chance on him no question.

 

A top top player

 

Rule him out then

 

Only if theres a fee involved at the end. I think this kid is quality. Similar player to cabaye. Would be a nice pairing with colback.

 

Colback is absolutely turd

 

Do you like any of our players Mr T?
Genuine question.

 

But if we use our players we will destroy their potential and crush their confidence. Better to do that to Chelsea's players instead.

But no I agree, unless we have option on a perm deal it's pointless and proves nothing about ambition from the club.

Either way we don't need more crocks.

 

Beggars cant be chosers. See Demba Ba contract (clause 1).

 

I'm not keen unless there is a permanent deal. I haven't seen enough of him to judge. Chelsea paid big money though, and we have seen this with De Bruyn, all they really need is game time.