Off Topic UK / EU Future

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is another way of saying that nothing will change at the border itself - people from countries such as France and Belgium have never needed Visas to travel to the UK. with, or without either Schengen or the EU, and that is not going to change. Try to change this and you will destroy tourism in the UK. What the text actually meant was that the effective border moves elsewhere ie. access to jobs, housing and benefits. So the expression 'Hard Border' is nothing but hot air. The problem is that there is too much casual, non contract, cash in hand and semi legal work on offer in the UK. this is why so many actually go there. In Germany it would be impossible because every worker has to have a bank account in Germany, be registered with the local authorities, have health insurance here etc. etc. otherwise nothing works. All the controls you need to actually reduce unwanted immigration are actually already there within EU. law.

We have covered this several times, yawn. We all agree there needs to be tighter controls on who is in the UK.
 
I see the EU are coming round to see the merit of the ERG's solution to solve the Irish border, all it needed was some common sense from Barnier's motley crew.

You really should read round a bit further. The EU are trying to find a form of words that will save May from total collapse in Westminister. Her difficulty is that she is in hock to to the DUP and knows that she needs their support to keep her in power. The traitors within the Tory party are out of their depth and would rather see Labour in power than admit they are clueless.
 
We have covered this several times, yawn. We all agree there needs to be tighter controls on who is in the UK.
Yet you’re advocating an Irish border with zero controls on who enters the UK.

Pop, there goes your argument.
 
You really should read round a bit further. The EU are trying to find a form of words that will save May from total collapse in Westminister. Her difficulty is that she is in hock to to the DUP and knows that she needs their support to keep her in power. The traitors within the Tory party are out of their depth and would rather see Labour in power than admit they are clueless.

The EU is backing the idea that technology could solve the Irish border issue, something they were advised months ago. This is something you said was impossible, maybe you should warn Barnier quickly. They obviously read the ERG Group recent paper on the subject.
 
I am afraid SH you just cannot debate in any sensible way.. .you always degenerate to abuse, diversion tactics etc......

You would not last 5 minutes in any negotiating team would you...?
I get more sense of reality from young earth creationists, geo-centrists, 9/11 truthers and flat-earthers than I do from our resident Berko-brexiteer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
I'm so pleased the IMF has predicted low growth for the UK after Brexit, with it's appalling recent record for predictions it undoubtedly means strong growth.
It should be concentrating on Italy which is about to go into recession.
 
You need to get out more......
Tell you what. You had a dig at me being a Civil Servant and asking how many jobs I had created. Would you like to tell us all how many times you've been asked to chair UN negotiations the result of which have been lauded by the Telegraph and pilloried by Labour but, a few years on, been proven right? I did it twice :-)
 
Tell you what. You had a dig at me being a Civil Servant and asking how many jobs I had created. Would you like to tell us all how many times you've been asked to chair UN negotiations the result of which have been lauded by the Telegraph and pilloried by Labour but, a few years on, been proven right? I did it twice :)

No, I simple asked you how many jobs had you created with your own money after you called Tim Martin of Wetherspoons a clown. Your backtracking was hilarious.
 
No, I simple asked you how many jobs had you created with your own money after you called Tim Martin of Wetherspoons a clown. Your backtracking was hilarious.
Basically the only things we can really know about each other are that we are all Hornets, and, possibly all computer nurds, sometimes keyboard warriors, and with a high percentage of grumpy old men putting the World to rights. Other than that we know very little about the people behind the user personae, and cannot really make assumptions about each other. We also cannot check up on whether the created user personae are accurate - anyway, as I was saying to Frau Merkel this morning <laugh>
 
No, I simple asked you how many jobs had you created with your own money after you called Tim Martin of Wetherspoons a clown. Your backtracking was hilarious.

I think we should all be hoping that the civil servants are doing their best to prevent a massive loss of jobs in the UK, something that some seem to believe is a good way to run the economy. Tim Martin wants special treatment to ensure that he can have as many EU workers as he requires, and at the same time is expanding his business into the EU to cover his back. Funny how people such as him and Rees-Mogg say one thing about leaving the EU, but are using it to protect their wealth.
 
No, I simple asked you how many jobs had you created with your own money after you called Tim Martin of Wetherspoons a clown. Your backtracking was hilarious.
I did not at any point call Tim Martin a clown and you know it. I compared Boris to the resident clown in Wetherspoons - i.e. the loud mouths you find in every branch every day of the week. Not Tim Martin, not the man who owns Wetherspoons or any other combination that would imply it was aimed at him. . You failed miserably at trying to twist my words. End of <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hornet-Fez and Toby
I did not at any point call Tim Martin a clown and you know it. I compared Boris to the resident clown in Wetherspoons - i.e. the loud mouths you find in every branch every day of the week. Not Tim Martin, not the man who owns Wetherspoons or any other combination that would imply it was aimed at him. . You failed miserably at trying to twist my words. End of <ok>

dodgy swerve!!
 
I think we should all be hoping that the civil servants are doing their best to prevent a massive loss of jobs in the UK, something that some seem to believe is a good way to run the economy. Tim Martin wants special treatment to ensure that he can have as many EU workers as he requires, and at the same time is expanding his business into the EU to cover his back. Funny how people such as him and Rees-Mogg say one thing about leaving the EU, but are using it to protect their wealth.

Tim Martin does not require special treatment, he will able to attempt to justify any call for migrant labour just like any other company. Short term contracts would be ideal. His non UK business is less than 1% with no openings in the EU in this financial year so a red herring. I find it strange that you think UK businesses should not trade in Europe.
 
Tim Martin does not require special treatment, he will able to attempt to justify any call for migrant labour just like any other company. Short term contracts would be ideal. His non UK business is less than 1% with no openings in the EU in this financial year so a red herring. I find it strange that you think UK businesses should not trade in Europe.

more twisting what people have said from you .... <yawn>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toby
Status
Not open for further replies.