Games until end November are like this 10 matches - Liverpool, Man City, Man Utd big boys* get all the games 9 - Arsenal 7 - Chelsea shows how boring they are with only 7 games 6 - Aston Villa, Everton, QPR, Tottenham 5 - Newcastle 4 - Burnley, Stoke, Swansea, West Brom, West Ham 3 - Crystal Palace, Hull, Leicester, Southampton, Sunderland Manchester United vs Swansea - Saturday 16, 12.45pm (BT Sport) opening game of the season, as they all know UTD are the biggest and best club * ££££ are not a big boy, but they did win the league
All the more evidence that the biggest club gets the biggest coverage. Which is why we just got the biggest kit deal. Blew Arsenal's record deal right out of the water. Watch for a bit of money laundering by the desert camel brigade to cover City's overspending by a couple of shirt and kit deals. 10 minutes overtime on one oil well should cover it
Not really surprising, nobody wants to watch Chelsea. I love watching football, and will pretty much watch any game that's on, but I found a lot of Chelsea games more of a chore to watch rather than entertainment last season. Bringing Mourinho back was the worst thing for Premier League football, it's really damaged the brands reputation. We look forward to more 0-0s for Chelsea in big games next season, as he sets his team up in a 631 formation
spot on King Shergar, with hindsight, the last year under Moyes was best forgotten. But imagine if we had Jose, with an ego that he considers to be bigger than any club. No way Jose, stick with your little horse. Sooner or later Jose's ego will clash with the Russian crook , and with two massive egos colliding, there is only one loser. Jose will be on his way again. Destination anywhere but Old Trafford.
Obvious. It's earned. But I would imagine all shirts need laundering, unless you want to smell like a camel pilots armpit
The question is this: is Adidas in some way related to united? Same owners ? It is not like the owners of the Etihad Airways paying £50billion for a 5 year sponsorship of city
I just thought considering it was the same day Utd tied up a £750million 10 yr shirt deal the comment was a tad hypocritical
What your missing Paulpowers left foot is that the Adidas deal was struck because Adidas will have worked out that they can profit from it, purely based on United as a world brand City however rely on grossly over valued "sponsorship" from the camel jockeys. Which is exactly why EUEFA imposed financial restrictions on City
They scored 5 against Spain and 3 against Brazil and Australia, they also where 2nd on the goal scoring table with 15 in 7 games. 7 more goals than Argentina and 4 more than Brazil. With a team that was considered 40/1 outsiders before a ball was kicked. They certainly weren't considered a strong side on paper going into the WC. I suggest you do your homework before you start making stupid statements
Spain was a thumping, but Brazil had just been spanked 7-1 in the Semis a couple of days before in their own Country. Can't believe you even mentioned Australia.
