Martin O'Neill has taken his stand on this, and called him back up to the team. What are your thoughts on this? Personally think he's innocent until proven guilty, which Martin O'Neill obviously agrees with.
MON isn't there to cast judgement though. I agree innocent until proven guilty, but does the old adage of 'no smoke without fire' not hold any value? Its not as if there has just been the one incident. Whether it is right or wrong to play Bramble doesn't matter one iota to MON and so it shouldn't. What he thinks of him off the pitch is a totally different matter.
Innocent or guilty, I dont know, but he put himself in the firing line, by being somewhere he should not have been, breaking the clubs rules as it were. lets hope he justifys MoN`s selection.