And has either?More whataboutery.
Johnson must answer for what he says.
Corbyn must answer for the state of rabid antisemitism in his party.
And has either?More whataboutery.
Johnson must answer for what he says.
Corbyn must answer for the state of rabid antisemitism in his party.
Does that make him antisemitic?
Circumstantial evidence, would that stand up in any court in the land?!?!? What a load of ****e. If jews have a problem they wont vote for him simple as that. Just as muslims wont for Boris. Does that mean jc has a problem with jews or boris a problem with muslims?It does if you look at the circumstantial evidence against him. Have a read of this, particularly the stuff about Corbyn at the end relating to the English irony quote and the mural row. You have to look at the thing as a whole, and how many Jewish people are being treated in the Labour Party and why they are leaving.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45030552
And has either?
Circumstantial evidence, would that stand up in any court in the land?!?!? What a load of ****e. If jews have a problem they wont vote for him simple as that. Just as muslims wont for Boris. Does that mean jc has a problem with jews or boris a problem with muslims?
Circumstantial evidence is not evidence at all! Ffs Goldy c'mon mate, you know that. I know it %100 as it was actually attempted in my court case years and years ago. It was thrown out at the point of reading!
Circumstantial evidence does not prove the existence or non existence of a fact mate , therefore without concrete evidence is not worth the paper it's written on.May be it wasn't sufficient in your case. Who knows? But circumstantial evidence is an accepted form of evidence. In a criminal trial, a jury will make a decision on the amount and quality of it.
Like who?Of course circumstantial evidence stands up in court. Many people have been convicted on the basis of circumstantial evidence.
You haven't read the article, have you Bob?
And do you not think JC will be judged by the electorate aswell as I stated earlier? You would think that Boris would choose his racist comment more carefully wouldnt you considering his cabinetJohnson will be judged by the electorate. But his chancellor of the exchequer is Muslim, and his home secretary is an Indian Ugandan Asian. And he has a sikh spokesperson
Like who?
What is the circumstantial evidence? And relating to JC and his non existent problem with Jews this proves what exactly?Here's one for a start! The police haven't even found the body, yet the husband is convicted of murder.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-50181729
And do you not think JC will be judged by the electorate aswell as I stated earlier? You would think that Boris would choose his racist comment more carefully wouldnt you considering his cabinet
It would be refreshing to hear of positive policies instead of just smear slogans. It would be refreshing to see this report on the Russians that Boris is sitting on. Anyone and everyone should be demanding to see that! It could well be the case that they helped influence labour support! Who knows until the government release it!
What is the circumstantial evidence? And relating to JC and his non existent problem with Jews this proves what exactly?