Ha Ha, so true though.You must log in or register to see media
Lately, I have noticed a lot of people mocking Brexit and how the news is reported.
Ha Ha, so true though.You must log in or register to see media
Have you ever been there? I wouldn,t live there if they paid me 40K a year to do so.There're plenty of houses for far less than £40k in Grimsby ... http://www.rightmove.co.uk/property-for-sale/find.html?locationIdentifier=REGION^578&sortType=1
Have you ever been there? I wouldn,t live there if they paid me 40K a year to do so.
Yes I have, and regardless of whether you'd like to live there or not the point is that you can buy a house up north for £40k or less. You said you couldn't and that those days have gone. Well the quick answer is yes that you can. I've no intention of being confrontational, it's just a statement of fact. What's the problem with living in Grimsby anyway?
Goldman Sachs has just leased a building under construction in Frankfurt for 1000 staff. They say:I wonder how the 'remoaners' will take this news
http://www.cityam.com/274466/michael-bloomberg-says-london-keep-rising-global-capital
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-41980919
I also believe Goldman Sacks also believes in London and has a new building coming.
...I am sure they will twist it.
Goldman Sachs has just leased a building under construction in Frankfurt for 1000 staff. They say:
“This expanded office space will allow us to grow our operations in Germany to continue serving our clients, as well as provide us with the space to execute on our Brexit contingency plan as needed,” They are expanding their presence in all 27 EU countries:
Richard Gnodde, chief executive of its international arm, has previously said the bank’s plans include hiring extra staff in the remaining 27 EU nations to cope with the extra business which will be channelled through Europe instead of London.
The building under construction in London is to replace the 3 existing offices they have here, not to expand. Of course it was commissioned way before the referendum. They may well be regretting that decision now, but they don’t have to occupy it, they can let it out (if there is anyone left prepared to rent...)
Twisted enough for you? Sorry for the use of actual quotes from the actual company.
Bloomberg has significant investments in London, he’s hardly going to talk it down. But I hope he’s right. None of these financial institutions wants to leave, the British voter has landed them with an potentially expensive pain in the arse, and the British Government has added to the uncertainty.
Believe whatever supports your existing prejudice. I do, it saves time, and the use of thought.
On a tangential but related point I am unsure why all these institutions need to be co-located in a few cities in these days of ultra connectivity and trading in the virtual, non geographical, space.
always one.I think they like to have people on the ground and a base in that country.On a tangential but related point I am unsure why all these institutions need to be co-located in a few cities in these days of ultra connectivity and trading in the virtual, non geographical, space, with decisions made by electronic algorithms.
Why do you invite comment then? I said Bloomberg has powerful motives to big up London and I hope he is right. He didn’t foresee the 2008 financial meltdown so let’s see how good his ‘foreseeable future’ guesses are. You conveniently ignore the direct quotes and real actions of Goldman Sachs who you used to back up your wishful thinking.always one.
I like your twisted words of 'if there is anyone left prepared to rent'. I am sure there will be plenty of people using the office.
Here is a quote from the man himself:
Asked on BBC Radio 4's Today programme if he would have gone ahead with the major development had be known about the Brexit decision, Mr Bloomberg said: "There's just no question in my mind ... [we] absolutely would have because London is always going to be the financial centre of Europe for the foreseeable future."
So that puts your theory to bed.
I am sure all these companies are running to put their money into Latvia Romania Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Italy instead of London.
With all due respect Sb I will always listen to people that know and are doing it rather than listen to someone like you on a forum.![]()
I suspect they will soon start working on the numbers of staff they have, wherever they sit. Financial services is a prime target for automation. I was thinking about my own role, which is largely slow motion crisis management resulting from poor decisions which looked good at the time years ago (I’m not complaining, I eat and drink well and enjoy myself). Good algorithms at a couple of points would significantly reduce the mistakes made by emotional humans arguing with each other and make me redundant. Bring it on!I think they like to have people on the ground and a base in that country.
Why do you invite comment then? I said Bloomberg has powerful motives to big up London and I hope he is right. He didn’t foresee the 2008 financial meltdown so let’s see how good his ‘foreseeable future’ guesses are. You conveniently ignore the direct quotes and real actions of Goldman Sachs who you used to back up your wishful thinking.
Some of us are accused of ‘doom and gloom’ which is probably fair, but the antidote isn’t head in the sand ‘it’ll all be ok because we are British’. A slow drift in a downward arc with a couple of sharp jolts along the way is probable, but still time to turn it round.
I’ll say it again, believe what you want, we’re not on here to change minds. At least I’m not.
I suspect they will soon start working on the numbers of staff they have, wherever they sit. Financial services is a prime target for automation. I was thinking about my own role, which is largely slow motion crisis management resulting from poor decisions which looked good at the time years ago (I’m not complaining, I eat and drink well and enjoy myself). Good algorithms at a couple of points would significantly reduce the mistakes made by emotional humans arguing with each other and make me redundant. Bring it on!
Why do you invite comment then? I said Bloomberg has powerful motives to big up London and I hope he is right. He didn’t foresee the 2008 financial meltdown so let’s see how good his ‘foreseeable future’ guesses are. You conveniently ignore the direct quotes and real actions of Goldman Sachs who you used to back up your wishful thinking.
Some of us are accused of ‘doom and gloom’ which is probably fair, but the antidote isn’t head in the sand ‘it’ll all be ok because we are British’. A slow drift in a downward arc with a couple of sharp jolts along the way is probable, but still time to turn it round.
I’ll say it again, believe what you want, we’re not on here to change minds. At least I’m not.
I suspect they will soon start working on the numbers of staff they have, wherever they sit. Financial services is a prime target for automation. I was thinking about my own role, which is largely slow motion crisis management resulting from poor decisions which looked good at the time years ago (I’m not complaining, I eat and drink well and enjoy myself). Good algorithms at a couple of points would significantly reduce the mistakes made by emotional humans arguing with each other and make me redundant. Bring it on!
You see, you cannot help yourself our heads aren't 'in the sand' I have never said ‘it’ll all be ok because we are British’. I just believe our future should be in our hands and our laws governed by us and not some guy in Brussels who has never been to this country.
How many of you would trust putting your money in a Latvian/Bulgarian/Greek/Romanian Bank?.....That's why the financial centre will be in London because it is geared up for it, it is trusted. It's the best. That is why before Brexit everyone was based in London. All this talk of Frankfurt and Paris will disappear with the rest of the fear campaign. You best take another look at your 'algorithms' and speed up the slow motion.
![]()