The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd December)

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

ellandback

Well-Known Member
Forum Moderator
Mar 30, 2011
62,954
38,058
113
Southampton
You must log in or register to see images


Good Morning. It's Tuesday 2nd December, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road

Why O'Neill would be the sensible choice for the ER hot seat

Despite Leeds United’s spirited 3-2 showing against Manchester City at the Etihad over the weekend, a result many fans saw as a “good defeat”, strong rumours started circulating that Daniel Farke’s tenure at Elland Road would be coming to an abrupt and imminent end before their midweek clash against Chelsea. Officially, the word is that his job is safe for at least the next two matches, but whispers around the club suggest otherwise. Yesterday, in a twist nobody saw coming, Gary O’Neill’s name suddenly entered the conversation.

By mid-afternoon, the former Bournemouth and Wolves boss was being discussed as an unlikely contender; by the evening, the betting markets had reacted sharply, with his odds plummeting from 12/1 to an 11/8 favourite with most major bookmakers. The question now on everyone’s lips is simple: would O’Neill actually be a good fit for Leeds?

O’Neill has quickly earned a reputation as one of the game’s most promising young managers, thanks to a blend of tactical flexibility and a calm, measured approach to leadership. At Bournemouth, he famously took over during a chaotic period and defied expectations to keep the Cherries in the Premier League. That achievement was all the more remarkable given the limited resources at his disposal, and many felt his sacking was harsh. He never had the chance to properly stamp his identity on the squad, but the club opted for a change, seizing the opportunity to appoint Andoni Iraola. It was a brutal call, but one that proved shrewd for Bournemouth. Perhaps Leeds should have taken a similar view last summer with Daniel Farke?

It wasn't long until Wolves, another team deep in the mire came knocking. O’Neill once again delivered safety, instilling belief and organisation throughout the squad. For Leeds, whose supporters crave a manager with resilience and a proven track record of getting more from less, O’Neill’s profile ticks many of the boxes. He may not be the big name many Whites fans crave, but as far as reliability is concerned - he's a safe option for a club like Leeds who do not have a great deal of money to throw around.

You must log in or register to see images


Blowing the whistle on fake keeper injuries

Goalkeepers feigning injury, almost always at a moment when their team desperately needs a regroup has become a talking pointing on social media outlet 'X' following Gianluigi Donnarumma's antics against Leeds at the weekend. With rules preventing keepers from receiving treatment off the pitch, the Manchester City shot-stopper went to ground, allowing his team mates the chance to re-group, as Pep Guardiola organised a team huddle.

It left Daniel Farke fuming as Manchester City took advantage of yet another footballing loophole. If football’s lawmakers can’t figure out a punishment that doesn’t backfire when a keeper is genuinely hurt, maybe it’s time to change the rules! Use the U.S. model: give each team one short, structured timeout per match, clock paused, captain as the only messenger, and resume play once the minute’s up.

Not only would it cut out the pantomime of “mystery injuries,” it’d add an extra spark of drama and give managers one more tool to change the game; all without dragging the spectacle down with endless play-acting. If footballers were punished for simulation (or any act of cheating), they wouldn't do it. I'm not saying that every foul should be scrutinised, but certainly blatant acts deserve repercussions.

You must log in or register to see images
 

Attachments

  • breakfast debate.jpg
    breakfast debate.jpg
    290.9 KB · Views: 64
Gary O’Niel is fooking stupid, short sighted, idiotic choice and if the 49ers go there then we are fooked as a club
 
You don't like him then?
If that’s the limit of our ambition then the club needs selling to someone who will invest in a positive future.

its fooking depressing this season watching DF out of his depth, having hardly any Dan James so far due to DF not using him when he is fit and yet allowing him to play for Wales and now having no Dan James again for another 8 weeks at least. How many weeks has Dan James spent away with Wales this season after three international breaks? We needed him as we had nobody on the right to partner Bogle except Aaronson.

At least we have Stach back but will he be starting
 
If that’s the limit of our ambition then the club needs selling to someone who will invest in a positive future.

its fooking depressing this season watching DF out of his depth, having hardly any Dan James so far due to DF not using him when he is fit and yet allowing him to play for Wales and now having no Dan James again for another 8 weeks at least. How many weeks has Dan James spent away with Wales this season after three international breaks? We needed him as we had nobody on the right to partner Bogle except Aaronson.

At least we have Stach back but will he be starting
So it’s Daniel Farke’s fault that Dan James picks up injuries. I know you don’t like him but for FFS get a grip <doh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: gombawn
So it’s Daniel Farke’s fault that Dan James picks up injuries. I know you don’t like him but for FFS get a grip <doh>
Whatthefuck are you on? Did I say that NO. I’m just peed off that yet again we dont get Dan James in the prem. you need to sort your head out ffs
 
Whatthefuck are you on? Did I say that NO. I’m just peed off that yet again we dont get Dan James in the prem. you need to sort your head out ffs
Personally mate so do you. Or perhaps try working on your posting style if you don’t want people to misunderstand the point you’re claiming to be making.