The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
They'd have wanted 10 to 20 more, but with their bowling attack, in these conditions, I think that's alright.
 
The only good thing about this horror show is the amount of swing on offer. That's a good sign for later.

Just a shame about the impact it's having now.
 
tomw24 said:
And this is why I don't watch women's cricket. For a final to be this **** is ridiculous.
Click to expand...
To be fair, the men’s eliminator last night was equally one-sided and only lasted 160 balls. At least this one is going the distance, more or less.
 
Congrats Oval. In bowler friendly conditions, the best bowling side easily win.

Fingers crossed that continues later!
 
tomw24 said:
I just don't find it entertaining. Tried it, don't like it. Same with woman's football. I'm not saying ban it, I'm just saying I don't find it entertaining.
Click to expand...

OK fair enough. I'm not into it either .

I just thought your comment was a bit OTT

That's the trouble with the Internet I suppose.
:emoticon-0150-hands
 
Last edited:
Not massively upset with being put in. If we can get a good score we can really put them under pressure with our bowling attack.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back