1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Bench

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by djsowtz, Sep 14, 2013.

?

SB only made one change today because....

Poll closed Sep 15, 2013.
  1. He didn't need to make any other changes

    4 vote(s)
    18.2%
  2. He didn't have the right people or positions available

    18 vote(s)
    81.8%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. djsowtz

    djsowtz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    Yet again, I have to question our bench, so the poll for tonight is....
     
    #1
  2. lewisc29

    lewisc29 Idiot

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,082
    Likes Received:
    1,577
    I think he should at least sick one recognised striker on the bench, even if it is Prossy/Fryatt/Mclean.
     
    #2
  3. McGregor HU5

    McGregor HU5 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2011
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    857
    I don't know why he has to have two centre-backs on the bench and a full back?
     
    #3
  4. djsowtz

    djsowtz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2012
    Messages:
    2,243
    Likes Received:
    1,831
    That's pretty much my point. I'm Pro-Prozzy, everyone knows that and I certainly don't think he would be any worse than Graham, but I would happily see any one of the strikers on the bench. And before anyone has a go, it's just my opinion, I'm not slagging SB
     
    #4
  5. Brucebones

    Brucebones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    9,131
    Likes Received:
    4,514
    I started to think about the bench when they equalised & realised that we had no striker, I was assuming that Graham would go off maybe for Meyler which in turn would push Aluko up top. The only problem I have with Aluko is if he is up front he doesn't stay there, but with Hudds & Livermore he shouldn't need to keep coming back to pick it up!
     
    #5
  6. City1904

    City1904 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    3,728
    Likes Received:
    1,498

    I think its because we don't play enough balls in to him, in and around the box where he is far more dangerous.

    I do think the Bench is week without Sagbo, we need at least one recognized striker on there. Don't care who but at least someone to bring on and cause a bit of danger.
     
    #6

  7. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    112,568
    Likes Received:
    78,937
    Two centre backs on the bench is bloody ridiculous.

    Even more so, when you consider our best back-up centre back wasn't even one of them.

    Twenty minutes to go today, I'd have put Prossy or Fryatt on for Graham.
     
    #7
  8. Amin Arrears

    Amin Arrears Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    39,594
    Likes Received:
    21,955
    Considering there was no striker on the bench, he should have benched the ineffective Graham, brought Rosenior on and pushed Elmo up to right wing dropping Koren behind Aluko and try and get him in behind their defence. If that wasn't working then get Boyd on for Elmo, switch Koren wide left and Boyd wide right and have the pair try to cut inside and smash them in from range.
     
    #8
  9. Steven Toast

    Steven Toast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,232
    Likes Received:
    20,797
    Bruce is on the bench because I don't think his Dad wants to leave him out of the matchday squad. Regardless of who was on the bench, Brucey only made the one change anyway. I'd have taken Koren off around the 80 minute mark for Boyd; I thought he had a great game but by the end he was blowing out his arse.

    Once Sagbo comes back, the bench will look slightly better and we'll see how far the nepotism goes when we find out who has to make way for the striker.
     
    #9
  10. Kempton

    Kempton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    24,472
    Likes Received:
    19,024
    Maybe we didn't have two centre backs on the bench,Bruce is a midfielder isn't he ? <grr>
     
    #10
  11. Steven Toast

    Steven Toast Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,232
    Likes Received:
    20,797
    Mods: This appears to have slipped through the swear filter.
     
    #11
  12. PLT

    PLT Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    27,474
    Likes Received:
    19,141
    Am I the only one who thought Graham looked like our best goal threat in the second half? It's a bit daft having three defenders on the bench but no strikers or Dudgeon on there. He obviously has no faith in the strikers we've got. I wouldn't have changed it today with the options we've got, I thought he did right as long as no one was tired and needed to come off which he obviously didn't think was the case.
     
    #12
  13. Chazz Rheinhold

    Chazz Rheinhold Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    59,755
    Likes Received:
    59,697
    Me too. Keep playing DG. By far our best CF.
     
    #13
  14. tigerrev

    tigerrev Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    5,708
    Likes Received:
    4,625
    Proschwitz is teflon coated - nothing sticks to him. Had he replaced Graham or Aluko late on we would have ended the game on the back foot rather than the front. SB clearly doesn't rate him or he would surely have been on the bench. I can only guess Fryatt is now set on a move away from the KC and maybe not in the right frame of mind or surely he would have been an option? No doubt Sagbo will be on the bench next Saturday.
     
    #14
  15. Brucebones

    Brucebones Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2012
    Messages:
    9,131
    Likes Received:
    4,514
    McLean would have been an option, a bit more pace than DG, although I think he might be on the way as well.
     
    #15

Share This Page