The argument/complete nonsense thread...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Hull has a few etymological theories.

1. It’s from Old Norse hyl- < Proto-Germanic *hulh- which means a ‘pool in a stream/river’. This would be cognate to modern Danish and Norwegian høl.

2. It’s from Old English hula (plural of hulu) < Proto-Germanic *hul- which means ‘covering’.

3. It’s from Proto-Brythonic *hʉl < Proto-Celtic *soulos (with regular sound change of /s/ > /h/ in Brythonic), probably from a verbal root ‘to press’.

The original name was therefore either *Hylvík (settlement by a pool in the river) in Old Norse, *Hulawíh in Old Northumbrian English (settlement of coverings/huts) or some old Celtic river name with the Germanic settlement suffix -vík/wíh/wíc. The Old Norse or Old Northumbrian forms vík/wíh are the origin of -wick and Wyke, identical to -wich in southern English dialects.
A part of the reason 'Kingston' never took hold, was because people thought it was a bit pompous for someone to think they could buy us even if (or especially because) they were the King, so just declined to use that bit.
Also, at the time, it was a whole collection of settlements, each feeling they were the main centre, such as Marfleet and Sculcoates, which was the biggest and had little connection to what became the business centre.

We're all just tribal, it's only the scale that varies.
 
Hullwick would probably be its proper full name today were it not for the royal charter.

Wyke was established in the 12th century as a town. Before then, it was probably little more than an Anglo-Scandinavian village or collection of hamlets along the River Hull with no fixed boundaries.
North Ferriby used to run to where Dairycoates is now. It fell under the grand region of the Wapentake of Hullshire, although that didn't actually include what is now the City itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
Just to add, like many, according to my birth certificate, even though I first saw this world on Beverley Rd. I was not born in 'Hull' but the City and County of Kingston, upon the River Hull.
 
Hullwick would probably be its proper full name today were it not for the royal charter.

Wyke was established in the 12th century as a town. Before then, it was probably little more than an Anglo-Scandinavian village or collection of hamlets along the River Hull with no fixed boundaries.

Settlements like Sutton and Bransholme, part of East Hull today, were just hamlets in the early Middle Ages. Sutton < Old English Súþtún (south-town/market) and Bransholme < Brandesholm (firebrand-hill).
Hullwick sounds awful. <laugh>
 
Genuine question, so what would you be seeing?
Red and white or brown and white hoops,sometimes if it's a very obvious green that I can relate to something,I'll get it right...Horse-racing is a barrel of laughs especially when there are big fields and snooker can be costly when you pot the brown instead of a red or use the pink as a cue ball.

Obviously I've erm blew myself across the room a few times doing electrical DIY,good news is the young lad that moved in next door is a spark.
 
North Ferriby used to run to where Dairycoates is now. It fell under the grand region of the Wapentake of Hullshire, although that didn't actually include what is now the City itself.
Settlements like Sutton and Bransholme, part of East Hull today, were just hamlets in the early Middle Ages. Sutton < Old English Súþtún (south-town/market) and Bransholme < Brandesholm (firebrand-hill). The latter seems to imply an area known for blacksmiths or metallurgy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD and TwoWrights
Settlements like Sutton and Bransholme, part of East Hull today, were just hamlets in the early Middle Ages. Sutton < Old English Súþtún (south-town/market) and Bransholme < Brandesholm (firebrand-hill). The latter seems to imply an area known for blacksmiths or metallurgy.
Hull History Nerd has been mentioned before, but he does a youtube video on Bransholme Castle that's worth a watch, as are his others. I'm sure he's happy, but sadly he's got a new job so not making any more videos for a bit.

You must log in or register to see media
 
Thanks, I was literally having this conversation the other day with someone about how it's odd hull has ended up with the name of the river as the name of the city, whereas Newcastle isn't called Tyne, for instance.

Because Hull is short, snappy and unique, like Coca Cola. It’s better than using the full name as it doesn’t share common and lousy words like Kingston and upon with many other places.
 
Thanks, I was literally having this conversation the other day with someone about how it's odd hull has ended up with the name of the river as the name of the city, whereas Newcastle isn't called Tyne, for instance.

They're not very imaginative, the Geordies.

They built a new castle on the bank of the River Tyne and thought 'what the **** are we gonna call this place?'
 
They're not very imaginative, the Geordies.

They built a new castle on the bank of the River Tyne and thought 'what the **** are we gonna call this place?'
I've looked up where the Old Castle was in the past because I'm sad like that. It gets worse as it's now called Newcastle Castle. <laugh>

There are a lot of place names that seem to point to places being bland. I mean, how dull must a place be for the wall (not even the building) to be the most significant landmark (Millwall) and don't get me started on Shepherd's Bush. <laugh>
 
Hullwick would probably be its proper full name today were it not for the royal charter.

Wyke was established in the 12th century as a town. Before then, it was probably little more than an Anglo-Scandinavian village or collection of hamlets along the River Hull with no fixed boundaries.
Aye. They refused Charles I entry and dropped the Kingston which became common parlance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
I reckon you should only be able to comment on the appearance of people, if you post a picture of your current self first. No 'back in my prime' pictures from 40 years ago.

It's always the ones that are the most vitriolic that cry the most afterwards as well. There's an odd little group on this forum that make it a worse place for everyone.
If we're thinking of going to those extremes,are we to start providing our most recent liver scan to indicate whether or not we are habitual drunkards? Or how about bank statements indicating how much we Ponce off the government?