1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Thank the board!!

Discussion in 'Sunderland' started by calmcumbrian, Oct 1, 2012.

  1. calmcumbrian

    calmcumbrian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,656
    Likes Received:
    144
    that they knew what they were doing in appointing MON and not Mark Hughes.QPR have spent a fortune,and,today are clueless!I reckon Hughes could be the first Premiership manager to be sacked!!
     
    #1
  2. Darth Plagueis

    Darth Plagueis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2012
    Messages:
    16,983
    Likes Received:
    3,388
    To be honest, I think it's the QPR owners that are clueless.

    Hughest is a good manager in the right setting.
     
    #2
  3. jdsafc

    jdsafc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    2,510
    Likes Received:
    1,261
    Their backing of him has been unequivocal. How could they have given him a worse setting?
     
    #3
  4. Jarramag88

    Jarramag88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2011
    Messages:
    1,788
    Likes Received:
    93
    They did the same last season. Treating the transfer window like fantasy football. Proof if it was needed that signing too many players can be just as bad as not signing enough. sky sports news all over them, loads of press exposure for all the new signings. ****ing clueless they are.
     
    #4
  5. monkmaster

    monkmaster Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    33
    I predicted a month ago that Hughes will be gone by xmas and old melted face will be joining the wide boy owners.....now that man knows how to spend money!
     
    #5
  6. Black Cat Kiwi

    Black Cat Kiwi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    3,727
    Likes Received:
    160

Share This Page