According to SSN, Mike Dean has said he didn't see Tevez's 'contact' with Barton, but would have red-carded him if he had. Why no retrospective action?...
Spooky, ain't it? If Tevez hadn't been illegally acquired, West Ham wouldn't have relegated Sheffield United. Warnock would, therefore, probably not have landed up at the Rs, who subsequently would possibly still be languising in the bottom-half of the Chamionship, or worse. He now appears to be the catalyst that gets one Joseph Barton away from our beloved club. Gotta love the guy, really. Also, if my auntie had a cock she'd be my uncle.
Aw, don't say that. I'm rather fond of ****s. Now I'm gonna have Carlos' ugly mug in me 'ead next time I go down on Mrs Uber. Mind you, it used to look more like Billy Bonds...
Tevez's lean mean grilling machine, a copy of George Foreman's He liked it so much he put his face on it.
When he and Lescott heard that Citeh was looking to get some new faces, they asked Mancini to put their names down for a couple.
You are right, some proper ugly ****ers there, I am surprised they are allowed to admit anyone under 18
Agree and it's the point I've made on other threads that we can't condone what Barton did but there should be fair and equitable treatment for all and there clearly hasn't been.
I've the complete reverse view. I couldn't give a sh*t about Tevez as hes not our player. Couldn't give a Monkey's about him. Barton ,on the other hand, is. So I'm glad hes gotten such a lengthy ban. Its just a shame they couldn't lock him up too.
He should get a 3 game ban for violent conduct but its the FA, they break their own rules time and time again. Its not even worth getting angry about it.
Good question. I would 100% accept the length of Barton's ban if the FA had shown some balance here. Tevez getting away scot free is a disgrace.
You will care about Tevez not being banned if we play them first game of the season and he scores the winner, ya eejit. This! Now then, that's that sorted... lol
