Their music is Poor. Ian Brown simply CANNOT sing, he is tuneless. Kasabian use samplers/Drum machines and backing tracks, any **** can do that. Gallacher is an average musician from an average band.
What? Even if you hate them, I think The Stone Roses are looked upon with a bit more ****in' respect than Muse. Noel was in a pretty big band as well, wasn't he?
Muse would have been better with a decent singer. He's no bad shakes as a guitarist but his voice sounds like he is being given electrotherapy treatment like in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest. By the way, Rage Against The Machine are superior to every other band mentioned in this thread so far. FACT.
They won Best Live Act in europe in 2007 and got nominated in 2010. It is fact you auld decrepit ****.
The Stone Roses were only ever popular in the UK and that was 20 years ago. Don't start with Oasis, they were the same, they were only popular because the UK music scene was so bad in the 90s. While the UK was churning out that dross the Yanks had Nirvana, STP, Pearl Jam, Soundgarden and Rage.
Kasabian, Muse, Noel Gallacher, Elbow... All music for tone deaf teenagers with no taste and no musical maturity. Any **** over the age of 20 listening to this ****e should be banned from ****ing listening to music.
Have any of you OAP's visited the dancin' recently? that music is ear rape and those yous are bitching about are angelic voices compared to that.
You get more like ER everyday I don't think Dev ever got over the death of Stuart Adamson. The day the music died.
What a list! And since when has been popular in the US had anything to with how good music is? The Stone Roses have had far more impact than Muse whether you like it or not.
