Probably yea Although maybe we plan to sell him straight away anyway Or we keep him ha But continuing with a similar team will be nice
The scavengers will be out to pick over the remains of City's sellable assets - Pandur, Hughes, Matazo (if fit from ACL), Belloumi (if fit from ACL), Millar (if fit from ACL), Slater and Coyle's Louis Vuitton washbag.
Probably less around 600, we do not have players to sell with big price tag, limited maneuver place due to rolling costs of last season. It could be even less than 400 if we relegate.
Pleased about Puerta, not too involved the other night but it was a team problem really. He actually created one of our best chances just before he got hooked so I was a little surprised he's the one who was taken off.
Easily over 200, at least 10 pages on this subject alone. 20+ pages of arguments, 30+ pages of general **** that some people find funny, but really isn’t, throw in some music chat & a link to some unrealistic player who we have no chance of signing, but for some reason people think we do, then the actual signings & how **** they are, or how unbelievabley brilliant the signings are & how we won the transfer window yet again. It’ll be there or there about!
Like when I mentioned that Fabio Carvalho had been recalled from RB Leipzig to Liverpool and I was told in no uncertain terms that there was no way he would ever come to us?
With how many players from the j league do well in europe Surprised we've never gone into that market Theyre always usually cheap fees too
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/ckgedpeg48mo If he's having to think about it, and is still open to ideas, then I think we should tell him to shove it and move on.