This can only be good news for us. It will also hopefully halt the sale of some of our better players.
please log in to view this image Brian and wee Googly's only accommodation option once the not 606 bers get on their case
I would imagine the removal of Stockbridge is one of the means of doing so Eric. You sound slightly disappointed in post three.
I was, with stockbridge being there the asset stripping rumours made sense considering his links. Now it looks like you are trying to go on the straight and narrow. Whether removing him has actually cut any costs is doubtful though considering you have hired a new financial director.
I seriously doubt Wallace will have the replacement on the same amount of money as Stockbridge earned.
Why? 200k isn't exactly extravagant. If you want the best man for the job then you have to pay top dollar. I would suspect your new appointment would be on more.
Eric we're happy about this you obviously aren't. Why are you bothering about us so much? Even if we have to sell Lee Wallace to save money we will still have a better team on the pitch than last season. Can you say the same? That's a rhetorical question by the way.
Not fussed either way. Rangers are 10 years behind us as we speak, 5 if you can get some serious investment.
Wit! You obviously haven't been paying attention Erica . Don't you know there is very little difference between the premier and league one .
Am feeling pretty dumb right now. Am still thinking Wallace might actually have a clue. If only rhebelbhoy would come on the Rangers board to educate us.
Wee Rhebbie is far too busy worrying about legislation that will never affect him to come on here mate .