1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Should We Look at Adopting Chelsea's Model?

Discussion in 'Hull City' started by StrovolosTiger, Oct 27, 2011.

  1. StrovolosTiger

    StrovolosTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,507
    Likes Received:
    154
    Apparently, Ken Bates, when he owned Chelsea, sold the pitch separately to the stadium to safeguard Stamford Bridge from ever falling into the hands of property developers.

    Seems like a good idea to me. If the council cite worries about future development of the KC away from a football stadium could they not sell/give the stadium to the Allams and retain ownership of the pitch (and all means of access rights). This would surely counter any fears of the stadium ever being pulled down and replaced by houses/offices/hotels etc.

    Don't believe I just suggested Ken Bates had a good idea!!!
     
    #1
  2. BernsteinTiger

    BernsteinTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    256
    If it's any comfort, I agree with you (and therefore, Bates)... but I have to say I feel very dirty now.

    It does make sense. The Pitch has very little capital value - most of that is in the stands, so the Allams shouldn't have a problem with raising money, but the stadium would be secured.

    Seems to make perfect sense.
     
    #2
  3. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,758
    Likes Received:
    76,341
    There's no need, they just had to write into the sale agreement that it could never be used as anything other than a sports stadium.

    Just at my home, which was originally owned by the church, has a covenant preventing it ever being converted into a pub/restaurant/strip club etc.
     
    #3
  4. pock tiger 64

    pock tiger 64 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    0
    spoil sports
     
    #4
  5. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,758
    Likes Received:
    76,341
    I know, I didn't even find out until after I'd already installed the pole's and the bar. :emoticon-0111-blush
     
    #5
  6. StrovolosTiger

    StrovolosTiger Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    6,507
    Likes Received:
    154
    You have a "healthy" relationship with Mrs. Lambo then?

    I'm still trying to persuade mine to do it with the light on!!

    :emoticon-0106-cryin
     
    #6
  7. pock tiger 64

    pock tiger 64 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    0
    still after 20 years persuading mine to do it still the biggest challenge
     
    #7
  8. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,758
    Likes Received:
    76,341
    Purple lights that flash on and off, that's your answer. <ok>
     
    #8
  9. flyingpotato

    flyingpotato New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    1
    Going back to David Lloyd days, didn't Boothferry Park have a similar covenant? with the pitch being classed as green belt (or something similar) and therefore unable to be built on. Planning permission has now been granted for housing, so I dont think covenents are as secure as you might think.
     
    #9
  10. Chiltons222

    Chiltons222 Active Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Messages:
    1,371
    Likes Received:
    0
    It is a good idea, but papa Allam needs to use the freehold of the whole site and stadium to raise enough money for the project. Abramovitch doesn't need to borrow, he will probably just pay in cash. :(
     
    #10

  11. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,758
    Likes Received:
    76,341
    As far as I know, a covenant can be reversed by those who instigated it, if the circumstances change. That was the case at Fer Ark, once the club had moved, there was absolutely no point in keeping that protection in place.
     
    #11
  12. HFFP

    HFFP Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,778
    Likes Received:
    1,195
    please log in to view this image
    I agree <ok>
     
    #12
  13. dazzar86

    dazzar86 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,324
    Likes Received:
    491
    Considering the council have to grant planning permission, all they'd have to do is refuse planning permission to stop housing being built on the land which is currently the pitch.
     
    #13

Share This Page