2 of them weeks we have no game so the 4 weeks wont be too long game wise. So who steps in. Liam Moore or Zak Whitbread For me especially at away games we will need a bit of experience. I find it no coincidence we stopped conceded stupid goals away once St. Ledger came into the side. So I think Zak Whitbread is a must for away games Maybe a bit harsh on Liam Moore as he has been playing very well
So st ledger has tweeted that he is going to be out for at least 4 weeks so, would people rather put zak in the middle with wes or put moore in there and de laet on the right?
Fair comment i think. especially for away games. I do wonder though if moore is going to get some proper game time in the middle. especially if it means he is 4th choice. Proud are you able to close or delete the thread i made?
I'd say Zak, as Moore can cover more positions, so is better used as a sub. Say Konch gets injured, you dont really want Moore moving to from CB to RB and De Laet moving to RB to LB as it may throw the defense off their game if too much shuffling happens.
agreed, Whitbread is a natural centre back. Moore is learning and looks good but we need to keep the consistency going now we have found ourselves near the top. Moore is useful on the bench as he can cover RB and CB
Norwich think if he can stay uninjured he is quality, IMO he must be given a start and Ledge can come back after 2-3 games because that is all i think Whitbread will manage at one time unfortunately.
Moore recently hasn't deserved to lose his place, but he's playing at RB, which I still feel is his better position. However, we also don't know how good a Whitbread-Morgan partnership will be. Much as I rate De Laet, it looks like he's going to be the one fighting for his place.