Off Topic Schofield quitting

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Smug in Boots said:
I always post 'No more Heroes' in these situations.

We have no idea what any of these people are really like for better or for worse ....

... I can't remember anyone ever hating Rolf Harris prior to his child molesting tbh.

My motto is 'entertain me and f**k off'.

I've no interest in anyone's private/family life and never believe talent excuses anyone from being a tosser. I wouldn't want to spend a second with Morrissey but would take any opportunity to see him onstage.
Click to expand...

Question.

If some Rich , senior old guy, has a much younger lady, junior to him, for his pleasures, what is the general comment, from us males at least?

I can only speak for myself, of course, but, assuming we are talikin about consenting adults, 'LUCKY BEGGAR' springs to mind.

But if instead it's a younger male, there tends to be a lot of fuss.

Double standards.????

And I'm with you. Other peoples priveate live are no concern of mine, as long as no laws are being broken.

(Added to keep the PC Brigade quiet).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopCat. and Smug in Boots
If you research on YouTube videos involving PS, going back months, there's been comments saying about "cover ups", "he's hiding a secret" how he's a "wrongun". I remember watching something a good few years ago about how "Celebs" including him would go to clubs in Essex and get up to all sorts, but the staff new to say nothing and it was well before camera phones.
 
polyphemus said:
Question.

If some Rich , senior old guy, has a much younger lady, junior to him, for his pleasures, what is the general comment, from us males at least?

I can only speak for myself, of course, but, assuming we are talikin about consenting adults, 'LUCKY BEGGAR' springs to mind.

But if instead it's a younger male, there tends to be a lot of fuss.

Double standards.????

And I'm with you. Other peoples priveate live are no concern of mine, as long as no laws are being broken.

(Added to keep the PC Brigade quiet).
Click to expand...
What if the young female was 15 when the older guy started ,er, doing "favours" for her.
Even if things only then became intimate when she turned 16, I'm sure there's a word for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns and young2077
Snaggey said:
What if the young female was 15 when the older guy started ,er, doing "favours" for her.
Even if things only then became intimate when she turned 16, I'm sure there's a word for that.
Click to expand...

I believe that the word you are seeking may be 'GROOMING'.

However as Groming is an offense you will understand that this wasn't what I was refering too..

Even as long as sixty years ago, when I was in The RAF, I saw a number of examples of NCO's getting 'lucky' with members of The WRAF.
As far as I was aware, complsion was never any part of any of these arrangements.

I am talking about adults doing what comes naturaly.
And in this specific case, where we have a senior male who I assume to be aged about sixty, I understand that the younger person was a work collegue.
Do TV companies employ children who are under 16 and who should be at School?
 
Last edited:
polyphemus said:
Question.

If some Rich , senior old guy, has a much younger lady, junior to him, for his pleasures, what is the general comment, from us males at least?

I can only speak for myself, of course, but, assuming we are talikin about consenting adults, 'LUCKY BEGGAR' springs to mind.

But if instead it's a younger male, there tends to be a lot of fuss.

Double standards.????

And I'm with you. Other peoples priveate live are no concern of mine, as long as no laws are being broken.

(Added to keep the PC Brigade quiet).
Click to expand...

Of course there are double standards, we're only supposed to pretend there aren't. Men are still more likely to be inheritors, wealthy from their work or powerful in different ways. Women are unfairly hampered by the demands of childbirth and chikdcare ...

... that may be unjust and primeval but it exists, sorry but it's true.

I'm as guilty as anyone of double standards and being judgemental. It makes me laugh out loud when people lecture me and say 'you should never judge a book by its cover'.

Don't be fiicking ridiculous, that's often all we have and, quite often, that cover is deliberately contrived to tell people how to see them. It works better with some people than others and, ironically, people's cover can send out a totally different message than what they believe they're sending.

Try working the door of a 2000 capacity club without judging books by covers ...

... "Can we have a little 'getting to know you time' before I decide whether or not you can come in" <laugh>
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: C Montgomery Burns
polyphemus said:
Question.

If some Rich , senior old guy, has a much younger lady, junior to him, for his pleasures, what is the general comment, from us males at least?

I can only speak for myself, of course, but, assuming we are talikin about consenting adults, 'LUCKY BEGGAR' springs to mind.

But if instead it's a younger male, there tends to be a lot of fuss.

Double standards.????

And I'm with you. Other peoples priveate live are no concern of mine, as long as no laws are being broken.

(Added to keep the PC Brigade quiet).
Click to expand...

Not if it was someone who met the female when they were well under age befriended them got them close to them and promised the help of their power and influence to get the jobs and opportunities they wanted.

It's morally wrong even if no laws were broken, which is still not known we only have his word that nothing illegal happened, no matter if it was a younger woman or man it's wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ISOE II and Smug in Boots
polyphemus said:
Question.

If some Rich , senior old guy, has a much younger lady, junior to him, for his pleasures, what is the general comment, from us males at least?

I can only speak for myself, of course, but, assuming we are talikin about consenting adults, 'LUCKY BEGGAR' springs to mind.

But if instead it's a younger male, there tends to be a lot of fuss.

Double standards.????

And I'm with you. Other peoples priveate live are no concern of mine, as long as no laws are being broken.

(Added to keep the PC Brigade quiet).
Click to expand...

Sorry mate, I forgot what thread I was on and totally missed your point ...

... just ignore all that shyte on the last response <laugh>
 
Ranj Singh chipping in with allegations of a toxic culture. Says he was phased out after raising concerns. Axe to grind, or grist to the mill?
 
rooch 3 said:
Where has this come from? I imagined him squeaky clean until he came out.
Click to expand...

I watched something years ago about a club in Essex where all the celebrities used to go well before mobile phones. Never said what went on but it was a "safe place" free of journos.Schofields name was mentioned and I remember thinking "oh aye".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robertson and Smug in Boots
Brainman said:
He regrets being found out.
I can’t say I’ve ever watched anything he’s been in.
I can’t seem to muster any interest in his demise.
Click to expand...

No idea why it's getting so much press coverage. If there's a chance he broke the law, fair enough, but there is no sign of criminal proceedings. Thought we were beyond this now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daz and cumbrianmackem
Daz said:
It now just looks like its being used as a distraction away from the political shambles with the covid enquiry.
Click to expand...

Completely agree. Not excusing what he's done - clearly a wrong un - but is it in the public interest to keep haranguing him. My local MP is banned from the houses of Parliament after being accused of several counts of rape. Because its a criminal investigation there's been nothing in the press. Meanwhile he still does door to door things and is 'working'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
Milton Nunez's Thong said:
No idea why it's getting so much press coverage. If there's a chance he broke the law, fair enough, but there is no sign of criminal proceedings. Thought we were beyond this now.
Click to expand...

It's all very strange isn’t it ...

... none of his interview makes a pick of sense.

Why is he saying that having a very brief fling with an adult is 'unforgivable'?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rooch 3
Smug in Boots said:
It's all very strange isn’t it ...

... none of his interview makes a pick of
Why is he saying that having a very brief fling with an adult is 'unforgivable'?
Click to expand...
They seem to dig themselves deeper holes every time they open their mouths. I would like him much more if he said, I’ve done nothing wrong so you can all just f uck off you bunch of
t wats. That’s of course if he hasn’t done anything wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vic9 and Smug in Boots
rooch 3 said:
They seem to dig themselves deeper holes every time they open their mouths. I would like him much more if he said, I’ve done nothing wrong so you can all just f uck off you bunch of
t wats. That’s of course if he hasn’t done anything wrong.
Click to expand...

From what he's said he's done absolutely nothing wrong.

So why would he have just committed suicide if not for his daughters.

Why has he provided a solictor to the other bloke.

Why does he believe TV will be any worse off without him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vic9 and rooch 3
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back