I'd get tonight out the way first, don't leave yourself wide open on the Chav board, Lazio are 3rd on GD, or joint top level on points with Juve, however you want to read it.
I can handle it. It's better to be out in the open facing than hiding away. I like putting myself at risk because it starts a bloody good argument and we all like that. Nothing will change my mind that Chelsea have been on the longest and luckiest flight of shight ever seen.
It's only fans of teams whose seasons are over by Christmas who demand that their teams hit top form in September. Utd never have.
SAF has the most outstanding record of getting his teams to peak in May when it matters. A quick thumb through the Rothmans yearbook will illustrate this point.
At this stage players are finding their feet; there are new players bedding into the team (RvP and Kagawa have linked up particularly well very quickly), others need to gain fitness and form after long lay offs (Vidic, Fletcher), others are missing through injury etc etc. Results are more important than performances Utd have won 4/5 competitive games- 4 wins in a row.
Come the New Year, when Utd have just won 14 consecutive games and are 15 points clear of Spurs, I'll remind some of their second rate punditry![]()
I'd normanlly make some sort of quip at that.![]()
City haven't really played with wide players under Mancini, but Spurs have been most successful when two out and out wingers are used with both full backs getting forward to support them. So whilst City struggled with a formation they are used to, Spurs are struggling with a formation which is alien to them. If the limitations are all too apparent in a team with City's quality, how confident are you that AVB can make it work at Spurs?
Yes, I watched most of the game. It was spoiled by Lazio's tactics and the ref.
However, I wouldn't rush to any conclusions after performances against two very inferior teams, especially with 0 in the goals for column at home. Whilst there may be reason for optimism, at present, this team is nowhere near the level of the team which beat Inter 3-1 or made light work of Liverpool and Newcastle with expansive attacking football. The wing play with supporting full backs was key to those displays. And there is no Modric or vdV to pull the strings either.
I've no doubt that the current Spurs team, in any formation, is better than 75% of the teams you will play this season. But whether they are good enough to maintain a top four challenge and progress to the latter stages of other competitions is open to doubt. This team is a work in progress. Spurs have gone backwards, IMO, in an attempt to go forwards. Chelsea trusted AVB to do the same when they saw the need to rebuild, but weren't prepared to allow a period of transition.
Being better than 75% of teams we will face basically means we are good enough for a top 4 challenge and to progress to latter stages of competitionsYes, I watched most of the game. It was spoiled by Lazio's tactics and the ref.
However, I wouldn't rush to any conclusions after performances against two very inferior teams, especially with 0 in the goals for column at home. Whilst there may be reason for optimism, at present, this team is nowhere near the level of the team which beat Inter 3-1 or made light work of Liverpool and Newcastle with expansive attacking football. The wing play with supporting full backs was key to those displays. And there is no Modric or vdV to pull the strings either.
I've no doubt that the current Spurs team, in any formation, is better than 75% of the teams you will play this season. But whether they are good enough to maintain a top four challenge and progress to the latter stages of other competitions is open to doubt. This team is a work in progress. Spurs have gone backwards, IMO, in an attempt to go forwards. Chelsea trusted AVB to do the same when they saw the need to rebuild, but weren't prepared to allow a period of transition.