Rival watch

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
The RDBD said:
The loan means he is on the company "creditors payable within N years" list.
The fact that a creditor is also the owner, is moot in the letter of the law.
Similarly if someone wants to be stupid on this front, he could simply
sell the debt to someone (another shareholder etc) for a nominal sum,
and do the converse once things have quietened down.

Chelsky is a Sugga Daddy plaything, not a business whose operation
is key to the size of Romans' final pension pot.
Click to expand...
I am not sure that is right. The loan is actually from a BVI company owned by Abramovich. If that company was confiscated from him through sanctions then Chelsea would owe the debt to whoever controlled the company post confiscation, presumably a national government. The loan presumably has some terms and conditions on repayment which could be enforced against Chelsea.
 
I believe Putin wants a return to the Soviet style with him as a miniature Stalin.This is a start. Abrimovich as a No.1 Commisar in charch of more oil wells?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
How did the officials do on the weekend? Let's ask a ref and a Scouser!
https://www.skysports.com/football/...nalty-appeal-for-handball-by-rodri-vs-everton
<doh>

Kick in the balls? That's fine.
Click to expand...
Both players went as high as each other and both missed the ball, complete accident and dealt with appropriately by the ref.

Really don't know why peeps are crying over this tbh.
Even chaloba is crying he had stitches from itl<laugh>

Could easily have been the other way round
 
Sucky said:
Both players went as high as each other and both missed the ball, complete accident and dealt with appropriately by the ref.

Really don't know why peeps are crying over this tbh.
Even chaloba is crying he had stitches from itl<laugh>

Could easily have been the other way round
Click to expand...
You must log in or register to see media

It's just an obvious red card. Chalobah's foot is well wide of Keita. He never endangers his opponent.
One player goes for the ball, while the other goes for two.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy The Spur, BrunelGunner, Diego and 1 other person
PleaseNotPoll said:
You must log in or register to see media

It's just an obvious red card. Chalobah's foot is well wide of Keita. He never endangers his opponent.
One player goes for the ball, while the other goes for two.
Click to expand...
Yeh i saw it mate, its a 50/50 ball and they both go high and miss, one gets caught & **** happens.

If you send off naby you have to send off chaloba too no?

Or you saying the contact and not the intent is what he should be punishing?

Either way you're wrong

And chalobah's salty tears are just icing in the cake for me anyway<laugh>
 
Sucky said:
Yeh i saw it mate, its a 50/50 ball and they both go high and miss, one gets caught & **** happens.

If you send off naby you have to send off chaloba too no?

Or you saying the contact and not the intent is what he should be punishing?

Either way you're wrong
Click to expand...
<doh>
Chalobah goes for the ball and gets the ball. Makes no contact with Keita, at all.
Keita misses the ball completely and kicks Chalobah full force in the nads.
These are not the same thing. They're not even close.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Changing Man
Interested to hear your take on Kante Rugby tackling robbo and no foul?
You must log in or register to see images
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
<doh>
Chalobah goes for the ball and gets the ball. Makes no contact with Keita, at all.
Keita misses the ball completely and kicks Chalobah full force in the nads.
These are not the same thing. They're not even close.
Click to expand...
What? Are you high bruv? <laugh>
Chaloba does not touch the ball.
 
Sucky said:
What? Are you high bruv? <laugh>
Chaloba does not touch the ball.
Click to expand...
Are you either blind or lying about having seen it?
Watch the first angle on the Sky tweet. The ball's going left, then it goes right. How did that happen?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
Are you either blind or lying about having seen it?
Watch the first angle on the Sky tweet. The ball's going left, then it goes right. How did that happen?
Click to expand...
I see no contact with the ball in those clips.

Ref obviously saw same as me
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back