1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Richmond V Rhegan

Discussion in 'Celtic' started by RebelBhoy, Apr 10, 2012.

  1. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Charlie Richmond was on sportsound tonight telling us that the strike was a mistake. the referee committee said he 'wasn't a team member'.

    "Not being a team player means I didn't suck up to the right people!"

    On Dallas ""He might have left, but look at what he is doing now and who he put in to replace him!"

    'Watch what you say in dressing rooms, you are already being spoke about!" Linesman and 4th officials lying about him.


    Regan hits back via tweet.

    Stewart M. Regan ‏ @StewartRegan Referee appointments are based on performance. Would prefer to see consistent under performers 'retire' without feeling need to blame others.


    Mee-****in-ow.

    If he was consistently underperforming then why were so many appeals against his decisions upheld?
     
    #1
  2. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    Richmond was a bit of a baloon in his time, a bungler, Captain Mainwairing type, no loss.

    Is he really sooking up Dallas' arse?
     
    #2
  3. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    The opposite by the sounds of it.

    He was ****e, but Regan needs to shut his hole.

    Richmond was reintroduced to the SPL on his watch. If he wasn't good enough, why give him games?
     
    #3
  4. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    I am only repeating this third hand btw. It is on the podcast apparently. I'll have a listen to that before shooting off any more. But it sounds like a boys club.
     
    #4
  5. DevAdvocate

    DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    63,752
    Likes Received:
    13,027
    Fair point.
     
    #5
  6. rogueleader

    rogueleader suave gringo

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    19,250
    Likes Received:
    8,235
    Ive had a listen, richmond comes across as rather vague and confused/ confusing...endless inference and innuendo...and he is really quite far up his own arse
     
    #6
  7. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    i listened to it last night. He thinks he is a great man. Trying to be smart and not reveal too much.

    Jim Spence did a good job trying to drag it out of him but I dont see the point if he is gonna keep everything to himself.
     
    #7
  8. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    The other thing is that our manager is up this week for criticising referees.


    Well played Rhegan<applause>

    Now Timmy can say that the CE of the SFA can criticise refs then so can the Lurgan biggit.

    I ****in pure hate that Taigy bead rattlin IRA biggit.
     
    #8
  9. Super hooper

    Super hooper New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    2,975
    Likes Received:
    66
    Rogue Leader Ive had a listen, Richmond comes across as rather vague and confused/ confusing...endless inference and innuendo...and he is really quite far up his own arse.

    I think Richmond demonstrated to you how he was deemed fit to be a SPL referee in the fist place, I can think of no other SPL referee that the above description doesn't fit.
     
    #9

Share This Page