1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Razak Returns to Citeh

Discussion in 'Charlton' started by SuperChrissyisfantasticPardswasatrocious, Oct 29, 2012.

  1. SuperChrissyisfantasticPardswasatrocious

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    11,734
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Bit of a strange one- no details yet if its because citeh want him in and around the first team, or whether there is something else. Either way, I'm disappointed. Thought he looked good at blackpool and the first half against Barnsley.
     
    #1
  2. ybabobmij

    ybabobmij Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,353
    Likes Received:
    10
    That was quick! Ho him.
     
    #2
  3. dick plumb

    dick plumb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,228
    Likes Received:
    990
    I would think that City wanted him to play and he wasn't.I would expect him to go out on loan to another club now.
     
    #3
  4. typical

    typical Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,305
    Likes Received:
    45
    Or he has been a naughty boy.....?
     
    #4
  5. Bitter & Malicious

    Bitter & Malicious Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,235
    Likes Received:
    206
    A massive miscalculation somewhere. Getting loan players in is a slap in the face for our own contracted players. Well, tough luck if the loan players do a better job. But this is the worst of both worlds. Maybe we ran out of money to pay him?

    Not surprised City took him back when they see players like Jackson, Pritchard, and Kerkar preferred in midfield. They sent him here to play.

    Who was really responsible for getting him in, and who was really responsible for leaving him out of the team after promising starts? I am sure there was a lot more to come from him once he settled in.

    When I looked at our recent performances and wondered how we could improve the team before our injured "stars" return, I could only think of bringing in Razak, so I am very disappointed.
     
    #5
  6. Bitter & Malicious

    Bitter & Malicious Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2011
    Messages:
    3,235
    Likes Received:
    206
    Yes, another possibility. Would still go down as a misjudgment by our management, though.
     
    #6
  7. SuperChrissyisfantasticPardswasatrocious

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    11,734
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    Powell has said he wanted him for he 3 months but there was nothing they could do. This suggests citeh have recalled him for footballing reasons.
     
    #7
  8. CAFC TED

    CAFC TED Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,215
    Likes Received:
    35
    mhmmm....ok
     
    #8
  9. WWOCB

    WWOCB Active Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,701
    Likes Received:
    2
    Probably similar to when we loaned Etheridge from Fulham, City must have expected him to play week in week out. Got to be honest, our centre-midfield was shocking on Saturday just as it has been all season (and it was arguably our weakest position last season aside from LM). He really should have been playing against Wolves.
     
    #9
  10. deleted.....

    deleted..... Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    13,064
    Likes Received:
    4,764
    I think Citeh probably looked at the fact that we brought in a central defender to play in midfield rather than play Razak and thought that we were taking the piss!
     
    #10

  11. Miketyson2007

    Miketyson2007 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2011
    Messages:
    3,021
    Likes Received:
    534
    Quality player only saw him at the Barnsley game head n shoulders above the rest of our team but I don't like loan players TBH
     
    #11
  12. ForestHillBilly

    ForestHillBilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2011
    Messages:
    14,601
    Likes Received:
    5,953
    Stephens will be fit very soon, and Hollands admitted that he had been playing badly, which was down to an injured toe, which is healing now. So we won't be needing Razak, assuming Hollands gets back to his best.
     
    #12
  13. SuperChrissyisfantasticPardswasatrocious

    Joined:
    May 9, 2011
    Messages:
    11,734
    Likes Received:
    1,782
    I really hope you're right, FHB. I really thought Razak was going to be a player we would keep till the end of the season. Reminded me of Alex Song a bit.
     
    #13
  14. Whats up Doc

    Whats up Doc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    1,105
    Likes Received:
    480
    Saw both the Blackpool and Barnsley games and wasn't overly impressed with Razak, especially in the Barnsley game, our lack of a central midfield in that game was incredible, not solely his fault but he was part of it and could see why Powell took him off.

    Nowhere near Song's standard, could see he was going places, not so certain with Razak.

    No great loss IMO, sure there'll be another CM loaned in from somewhere soon who'll be better.
     
    #14
  15. jeffers'ears

    jeffers'ears Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    Messages:
    155
    Likes Received:
    0
    He said on Twitter it was due to injury.
     
    #15

Share This Page