1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Quit your whinging

Discussion in 'Manchester United' started by lifecheshirewhite, Jan 2, 2014.

  1. lifecheshirewhite

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    31,018
    Likes Received:
    20,982
    Young must have got half a dozen penalties when no one touched him,Moynes should be man enough to admit young got his just rewards.
     
    #1
  2. Tobes

    Tobes Warden
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2012
    Messages:
    72,661
    Likes Received:
    57,082
    Would read again
     
    #2
  3. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    28,225
    Likes Received:
    12,208
    Top Post <ok> sign him up for match day threads
     
    #3
  4. chelsea - over 100 years of history

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,306
    Likes Received:
    939
    To be fair the OP is right. If you are a serial cheat like Young, a ref is always going to naturally be more wary of giving pens. Reap what you sow and all that...
     
    #4
  5. SpursDisciple

    SpursDisciple Booking: Mod abuse - overturned on appeal
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    30,142
    Likes Received:
    16,897
    I agree. And therefore Oscar should get nothing next time he is fouled. And Bale (now he plays for Madrid).
     
    #5
  6. Bodinki

    Bodinki You're welcome
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2011
    Messages:
    27,847
    Likes Received:
    15,531
    Its not that they should get nothing next time they are legitimately fouled. If it is blatantly obvious then the ref should call it how he sees it.
    What they are saying is, in 50-50 decisions where the ref isnt entirely sure, if the player has a history of play acting, it is bound to influence his decision on whether to award the foul or not.
     
    #6
  7. chelsea - over 100 years of history

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,306
    Likes Received:
    939
    Exactly...that shouldn't of needed explaining but you know what spuds are like!!
     
    #7
  8. BBFs Unpopular View

    BBFs Unpopular View Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    22,301
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    ..Fixed<ok>
     
    #8
  9. BBFs Unpopular View

    BBFs Unpopular View Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    22,301
    Likes Received:
    1,658

    It was never a penalty anyway, Young was mid air doing the matrix before the keeper touched his foot and the ball was in the 6 yard box before there was any contact.
     
    #9
  10. Gazautd

    Gazautd Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    13
    Irrelevant..Dangerous challenge regardless of who or where it was. Young's rep influenced the decision but don't say it was never a pen?
     
    #10

  11. BBFs Unpopular View

    BBFs Unpopular View Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    22,301
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    It wasn't dangerous play it was a keeper coming out, sweet jebus you make me laugh, last week Young went in on the keeper studs out and leg off the ground and it was judged a "coming together" "young had a right to go for it" now this week it's "the keeper fouled him" "the keeper was playing dangerously" when it's the keepers turn.

    It was not dangerous and it was not a penalty.
     
    #11
  12. Gazautd

    Gazautd Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    13
    You really are a stupid poster. People have said it in the past but I've never really paid no attention to it.
    If your biased, just laugh an say "tough ****".. don't try to reason it with nonsense "facts"
    9b639fd5-b170-494c-8098-3770c6b90116-460x276.jpg
    So a knee high challenge is not dangerous...OK....
     
    #12
  13. BBFs Unpopular View

    BBFs Unpopular View Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2013
    Messages:
    22,301
    Likes Received:
    1,658
    It's easy to paint a horrific picture with a still frame. Very easy to give the wrong impression, I seen the game and watched the replays. It was nothing like how you think that image portrays it. They were both going for a ball young crossed it and the keeper slid towards him but you can see even in that image that he keeper came nowhere near to hurting him, he tries to block the cross or shot and continues sliding, it was pissing wet wasn't it? Young was never in any danger but because you have a player raising his boot then it must be a foul, it aint black and white and Webb saw it the other way, all of a sudden you mancs are not happy with Webb.

    If Eto can stay on the pitch for what he did to Henderson then that was never a foul :D
     
    #13
  14. Diego

    Diego Lone Ranger

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    47,864
    Likes Received:
    24,043

    Probably just going off Eto`o reputation, he is not known for fouling so the ref just figured it wasn`t a foul. Shame we don`t have refs who call what they see instead of going off something they saw in slow motion three months ago.
     
    #14
  15. chelsea - over 100 years of history

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    9,306
    Likes Received:
    939
    Could have easily 'fixed' it with all your divers as well like Rat Boy and Stevie Me. All clubs have them and sooner there is a greater punishment than the potential reward for diving the better
     
    #15

Share This Page