Match Day Thread QPR v ATALANTA

[bobmid]

On my phone so can't copy the link but Rangers match report about the game says, "Rangers lined up in a 4-2-3-1 formation from the begining"

"In Midfield Massimo Luongo and Ale Faurlin were deployed just in front of the back four".

On 55 mins Karl Henry replaced... Luongo

On 61 mins Diakité replaced Faurlin

Well it didn't line up like that on the pitch

 

[durbar2003]

It's a forum for debating QPR. I put my point across and pick up on where I think people are mistaken and sustain my arguments.

I also point out flaws in opinion's of others and where this can't be sustained it's an easy option to get stroppy as Durbar and Elnino have recently.

Do what you like. If you think i'm talking bullshit then fine. You can block, ignore or tell me why i'm talking bull **** if you can manage it. Easy route of course is to apply censorship and exist in happy bubble where you don't doubt your unchallenged opinions

My opinion was that a loan is not a sale. Where did I go wrong Damaged?

 

[qprbeth]

This really sounds like an arguement over nothing

We will play Henry as other managers have before... he will be the midfielder to bring on to hold on to the points.
He will barely start but will be a very valuable squad member, to finish off matches.

He is the perfect player to have on the bench and I for one am delighted he is still with us

 

[rangercol]

IMO, playing 4-2-3-1, Henry and Faurlin would be a perfect partnership.

 

[Swords Hoopster.]

Personally think its worse if like you your only contribution to this debate is a cheek little insult on someone's name

Nurse: "Its that time again Peter"

You must log in or register to see images