QPR in trouble???

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
WBA2_QPR3 said:
Your true placing will soon become apparent, Merson was spot on

BTW Dave, tone down the swearing eh, it just makes you look like a sad angry old man

And as for coming onto your board? Maybe its due to persistent wumming from half of your forum posters on the QPR board
Click to expand...

Now you are dredging the depths by invoking paul merson. Only 11 points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It will be interesting to see how many more points you get by the end of the season.
 
Dear Mr QPR, not really interested in your club, but dont like the try to buy success stance you have taken this year, if you fail there will be problems for your club but after it has happened so many times before with other clubs including us I have no sympathy with the money men.

Hope you survive though as it would be good for all 3 new boys to stay up, we are not safe yet and I dont think we are anywhere near arrogant enough to believe so and we have some really tough fixtures coming up so it aint going to be easy, but a win Saturday could start another run for us and then we will be chirping happily ready for a nice summer rest and start again.

Now **D off
 
a qpr fan who wants wolves to win out of spite against us (for some unknown reason)... what a total dipstick <doh>

i watched the qpr match yesterday and let me tell you it was the flukiest result i've seen in a very long time. if liverpool had a decent forward it could have been five or six nil. great result for qpr but it masked some serious deficiencies and i can't see them surviving based on that game, despite a good last few minutes.
 
And it has to be said out of their remaining games you would have chosen Liverpool at home as one of those with the best chance of a result.
 
In all fairness, we at QPR have had to learn humility the hard way this season by having the stuffing knocked out of us by all and sundry, even Rochdale in the Carling cup!
Hats off to yourselves and Swansea, you have had a brilliant first season and have done it with style! I don't feel bitterness or hatred towards you; a certain envy, to be sure, and if we are to stay up, we'll have to earn it by getting results like last night's when all seems hopeless.
The OP asks the question, and the answer is yes, but not as much trouble as yesterday and hopefully less and less as the run-in progresses.
We may or may not stay up, but we have certainly turned a corner in belief and confidence and whatever happens to us, well we'll deserve it.
Peace gentlemen.
 
Grinning~Cur said:
In all fairness, we at QPR have had to learn humility the hard way this season by having the stuffing knocked out of us by all and sundry, even Rochdale in the Carling cup!
Hats off to yourselves and Swansea, you have had a brilliant first season and have done it with style! I don't feel bitterness or hatred towards you; a certain envy, to be sure, and if we are to stay up, we'll have to earn it by getting results like last night's when all seems hopeless.
The OP asks the question, and the answer is yes, but not as much trouble as yesterday and hopefully less and less as the run-in progresses.
We may or may not stay up, but we have certainly turned a corner in belief and confidence and whatever happens to us, well we'll deserve it.
Peace gentlemen.
Click to expand...

Fair play to this man here.

I actually don't have much of a problem with QPR. Yes, they were the title winners last year and gave a bit of stick about it, but realistically they won it fair and square, so we've got nothing to hold against them and I don't think anyone does. It will be nice to finish above them, but to a certain extent I'd like to see them stay up, if only to get rid of some of the tired teams.

Also, yesterday's result was hilarious, well played to them is all I can say. Should give them a bit of belief going into a tough run in, but they're not the only ones at the bottom with some difficult matches coming up. They've got a decent chance now.
 
Canary Rob said:
Fair play to this man here.

I actually don't have much of a problem with QPR. Yes, they were the title winners last year and gave a bit of stick about it, but realistically they won it fair and square, so we've got nothing to hold against them and I don't think anyone does. It will be nice to finish above them, but to a certain extent I'd like to see them stay up, if only to get rid of some of the tired teams.

Also, yesterday's result was hilarious, well played to them is all I can say. Should give them a bit of belief going into a tough run in, but they're not the only ones at the bottom with some difficult matches coming up. They've got a decent chance now.
Click to expand...

Well said that man.

And its also kept the Mickey Mousers at work quiet instead of the "Steeeeeeeevie GEEEEEEEEEEE" ****e you get when they win once in a blue moon.
 
Yes, I think TF has found to his cost (just as well he has deep pockets), that just because you buy experienced players, it doesn't guarantee you success and can leave you with a hefty wage bill each week. Never really understood his decision to get rid of NW who got you to be champions last year - though we were catching you up towards the end.
 
Don't wanna start a fight here but I think the reason WBA has responded the way he has is because You guys seemed to be supporting Liverpool by saying "Carroll has to go" "Why was Suerez taken off?" and criticising Dalgleish's subs.
 
The Billionth QPR Fan said:
Don't wanna start a fight here but I think the reason WBA has responded the way he has is because You guys seemed to be supporting Liverpool by saying "Carroll has to go" "Why was Suerez taken off?" and criticising Dalgleish's subs.
Click to expand...

Commenting on Liverpool's tactics can hardly be construed as supporting them, can it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back