Pud do me and do yourself and this board a good turn. Explain to me how I P.M. Mick can resolve this issue. I don't want to prolong it and I am not trying to score points but I am convinced there is an important matter to be made right. Now that you have come involved can you please help to get this put right. Please Pud.
Mick will not answer PM's and Pud - as far as I know is not Mick's PA, nor does he have a direct line to Mick - so he cannot pass messages on.
SH PM cyprussyd but you'll have to do it at least 10 times before he responds. Just keep PMing him till he responds: http://www.not606.com/private.php?do=newpm&u=1000459
I have absolutely no intention of P.M. anyone until it is explained to me how we can undo the damage caused by the posting on the 26th May indicating Mick knew that the young Mc Cann child who was missing has had sexual experience. People are getting in trouble for talking about the religion of Rangers players and someone else for posting "Up the IRA". I just think posting that that poor child is sexually experienced is more hurtful and more offensive than the posts against the Rangers player Little or "Up the IRA" when there is no such thing. If Pud or Mick wish to explain to me how this can be resolved by the use of P.M. I will of course use P.M.
What thread was this Hoops? I never saw it I don't think, do you have a link? I don't particulary care for jokes on such subject matter but let's be honest here, you have taken people's comments out of context before so let's see what Mick said before we stark sharpening our pitchforks.
Cheers Hoopster I'm putting away my pitchfork, I had assumed that Mick had started a thread and not just made a sick joke. As distasteful as it was it's hardly the worst thing i've read on here so i'll let Hoops crack on and look for an apology.
I wouldn't think mmany people would recognise Mick's comment about the wee Mc Cann child to be a joke. I like to laugh at funny jokes, there was nothing funny here. I know some people are saying how did Mick think that the McCann child had been sexually active. Had Mick some personal experience. I would very much doubt it and would defend Mick against any person saying that he had. Mick or his friend Pud should come out clearly and clarify the whole thing. Denying removing thread and apologising would be the right thing to do.
Mind the step. As far as I am aware anyone who could post that the young McCann girl has been sexually active has either a very rich imagination or has clearly been acting in away way that doesn't bear thinking about. The McCanns families and friends memories are still to vivid and too sad for an idiot to post rubbish like that. Dev said he has seen worse, all I can say is that i haven't and cannot imagine anything worse and the last thing anybody wants is people to try to prove me wrong and post shoite.
So Mick wonderful as people have long suspected you are a *****. Most people that way inclined don't advertise it but then I hear the Isle of Man is different. You have just once again demonstrated how wealth can destroy a man. Maybe sometime you will get to know children in the normal way and will then realise the stupidity of your attempts to gain favour with some of the low life on this board who may even think there is an element of humour in your post. In the mean time I think you should grow up become an adult and apologise and remove these offensive posts.
