..we did actually make it to the play offs, and even the final. If McG will be fit by then, should he start? If you look at our record with and without him, our points to games ratio is better since he's been injured (1.42 with McG and 1.6 since he's been injured) Assuming that all our loans will be able to play in the play offs, should we not stick with Murphy and Williams up front? Your thoughts?
We had a poor start to the season and that wasn't down to McGoldrick. Williams has made a huge impact but we'd be even more dangerous with both of them fit. I'd be playing almost a 4-2-4 Gerken Chambers Smith Berra Cresswell Hyam Skuse Hunt Williams McGoldrick Murphy
That team looks a bit unbalanced to me Hampy. You only have Hunt as a true wide player, and i think Williams and McG are a bit too similar in that they both like to come deep and get the ball. I think it would be dangerous to play them both, and good teams will probably be able to expolit our lack of midfield. Personaly i'd prefer to see the players that are in form and have match fitness - so i would probably stick with Murphy/Williams and have Hunt and Ando as the wide men.
Like your team Hampy, not to sure about the formattion though......but on the other hand...Attack, attack, attack attack attack..!
The loss of Dids has been made up for by the attacking threat posed by Williams and Muprhy's inspired form in front of goal this season. We also have a big threat from corners through Berra and Smithy and Anderson looks like he can chip in from the flanks as well. We now have some very good attacking options and we can now cause teams more problems going forwards then we have done all season!
